Corporate Accountability

Congressional Power Again in Supreme Court’s Sights

By John Gramlich, CQ Roll Call

 

The Supreme Court opened a new term Monday that so far lacks the blockbuster cases that marked its last session, when the justices struck down the heart of two landmark social laws — the 1965 Voting Rights Act and the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act — that received overwhelmingly bipartisan backing in Congress.

 

The court’s new term, however, still provides plenty of opportunities for the justices to either circumscribe or reinforce congressional authority, including in ways that will divide the political parties.

 

 

“This term presents the court with a large number of opportunities to cut back on statutes passed by Congress and limit Congress’ power itself,” said Doug Kendall, president of the progressive Constitutional Accountability Center. “Anyone caring about Congress’ ability to fix national problems should be closely watching what the Supreme Court is up to.”

 

Kendall added that the current political paralysis in Congress — exemplified by the first government shutdown in 17 years — raises the stakes at the Supreme Court.

 

“Historically, Congress has been much more active and aggressive in overturning statutory rulings by the Supreme Court,” he said. “It has, by and large, stopp[ed] overturning Supreme Court rulings, which allows the court to encroach significantly on congressional power.”… 

More from Corporate Accountability

Corporate Accountability
September 9, 2025

ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS—Fifth Circuit rejects petition challenging OCC authority to enforce national banking rules

Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw
The court distinguished the national banking regulatory regime from the SEC’s antifraud provision in Jarkesy and the...
Corporate Accountability
July 11, 2025

This Group’s Record in Front of the Roberts Court Is Mind-Boggling

Slate
In a provocative dissenting opinion, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson recently called out her colleagues on the Supreme Court...
By: Ana Builes, Brian R. Frazelle
Corporate Accountability
July 2, 2025

Moneyed Interests Still Prevail at the Supreme Court (2024-2025 Term)

The Court Continues to Favor Corporations over Workers, Consumers, and the Environment.
By: Brian R. Frazelle, Ana Builes
Corporate Accountability
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Novartis v. Secretary United States Department of Health and Human Services

In Novartis v. Secretary United States Department of Health and Human Services, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit considered whether the Inflation Reduction Act’s Medicare drug price negotiation program is an unconstitutional...
Corporate Accountability
January 28, 2025

Federal Deposit Insurance as Jarkesy Waiver

Yale Journal on Regulation
An argument lurking just beneath the surface in a pending Fifth Circuit case could stem...
Corporate Accountability
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Boehringer Ingelheim v. Department of Health and Human Services

In Boehringer Ingelheim v. Department of Health and Human Services, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit considered whether the Inflation Reduction Act’s Medicare drug price negotiation program is an unconstitutional taking...