Rule of Law

Connecticut US Senator, other Dems file suit to block new acting AG

U.S. Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Connecticut, joined two other Democrats Monday in taking legal action to challenge the constitutionality of President Donald Trump‘s decision to appoint Matthew Whitaker acting attorney general.

Blumenthal and U.S. Sens. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-Rhode Island, and Mazie Hirono, D-Hawaii, filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia alleging that the president violated the Constitution’s Appointments Clause by selecting Whitaker, who has never been confirmed by the Senate.

The effort, supported by Protect Democracy and the Constitutional Accountability Center, seeks to declare Whitaker’s appointment unconstitutional and block him from serving as acting AG — a position which puts him in charge of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 election. 

Arguing that Whitaker’s appointment “so flagrantly defies constitutional law that any viewer of School House Rock would recognize it,” Blumenthal accused Trump of denying senators their constitutional obligation of scrutinizing the nomination.

“Americans prize a system of checks and balances, which President Trump’s dictatorial appointment betrays. … The reason is simple: Whitaker would never pass the advice and consent test,” he said in a statement. “In selecting a so-called ‘constitutional nobody’ and thwarting every senator’s constitutional duty, Trump leaves us no choice but to seek recourse through the courts.”

Whitehouse, meanwhile, contended that “the stakes are too high to allow the president to install an unconfirmed lackey to lead the Department of Justice — a lackey whose stated purpose, apparently, is undermining a major investigation into the president.”

Hirono said she and her colleagues want to court to clarify that the U.S. Senate must confirm Whitaker’s appointment as acting AG for the White House to prevent violating the Constitution’s Appointments Clause.

Trump announced earlier this month that Whitaker would take over for Jeff Sessions as the new acting attorney general before a permanent replacement is “nominated at a later date.”

Sessions, whom Trump repeatedly criticized for recusing himself from the Russia probe, resigned at the president’s request.

The appointment drew criticism from some, including U.S. Sen. Ed Markey, D-Massachusetts.

The state of Maryland, meanwhile, has also reportedly challenged Whitaker’s appointment in court, arguing that Trump went around the Constitution and Justice Department’s succession plan in naming him acting AG.

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Catholic Charities Fort Worth v. Department of Health and Human Services

In Catholic Charities Forth Worth v. Department of Health and Human Services, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is considering whether the Trump administration’s unilateral decision to freeze funding appropriated for...
Rule of Law
March 5, 2025

The Virtues and Necessity of Independent Agencies

In the month and a half since President Trump took office for his second term,...
By: Alice Lesniak
Rule of Law
March 1, 2025

Did The Supreme Court Already Accept Donald Trump’s Autocratic Vision Of The Presidency? Trump Thinks So.

HuffPost
The disastrous consequences of the Supreme Court’s immunity decision in Trump v. United States may...
Rule of Law
February 25, 2025

Trump defying a court order would trigger a constitutional crisis

The Hill
As federal courts continue to issue injunctions blocking President Trump’s efforts to seize new extra-constitutional...
By: David H. Gans
Rule of Law
February 25, 2025

RELEASE: Today’s Deeply Disappointing Supreme Court Decision Undermines Access to the Courts in Contravention of Congress’s Plan

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Lackey v. Stinnie, a...
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Harris v. Bessent

In Harris v. Bessent, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is considering whether Trump’s firing of Merit Systems Protection Board Chair Cathy Harris was illegal.