Federal Courts and Nominations

RELEASE: High Court Urged To Adapt Its Argument Schedule To Extraordinary Circumstances

“Whether it means holding videoconference or telephonic hearings as other federal courts do, or using some other method, we are confident the Supreme Court can adapt to the extraordinary circumstances in which we find ourselves and continue to do its job.” — CAC President Elizabeth Wydra

WASHINGTON – Following news of the Supreme Court’s postponement of upcoming oral arguments, Constitutional Accountability Center President Elizabeth Wydra issued the following reaction:

We understand and respect the Supreme Court’s announcement of the postponement of oral arguments as an acknowledgment of the health and safety of the justices, court personnel, litigants, and the communities in which they live and work. However, this postponement should not delay the high court’s resolution of the critical cases currently pending before it, particularly the cases involving congressional and grand jury subpoenas of the President’s financial records. Whether it means holding videoconference or telephonic hearings as other federal courts do, or using some other method, we are confident the Supreme Court can adapt to the extraordinary circumstances in which we find ourselves and continue to do its job. Such adaptation would honor both the significance of the issues that lie before the Court this term, and the significance of the Court at the head of one of our three branches of government.

#

Resources:

CAC case page, Trump v. Mazars (consolidated with Trump v. Deutsche Bank): https://www.theusconstitution.org/litigation/trump-v-mazars-usa-llp/

##

Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history. Visit CAC’s website at www.theusconstitution.org.

###

More from Federal Courts and Nominations

Federal Courts and Nominations
February 12, 2020

Empirical SCOTUS: About this term: OT 2019

SCOTUSblog/Empirical SCOTUS
“So far, Brianne Gorod of the Constitutional Accountability Center is counsel of record on the...
By: Brianne J. Gorod, By Adam Feldman
Federal Courts and Nominations
January 29, 2020

How the Supreme Court Contributed to Growing Inequality

The American Prospect
“Progressive groups such as the Constitutional Accountability Center have claimed originalism for the left, accusing...
Federal Courts and Nominations
January 16, 2020

EVENT: Are We All Textualists and Originalists Now?

Host: American Constitution Society - Georgetown University Law Center
A discussion with progressive constitutional experts on how prominent textualism and originalism have become in...
Participants: Elizabeth B. Wydra, Victoria Nourse, John Mikhail, Farah Peterson
Federal Courts and Nominations
January 2, 2020

SCOTUS goes into the new year with a loaded plate as impeachment trial looms

ABA Journal
The U.S. Supreme Court has multiple high-profile cases on its docket this term, including cases...
Federal Courts and Nominations
December 18, 2019

PODCAST (Sphere): Should the U.S. Supreme Court Overturn More Laws?

Sphere
In general, are most laws and regulations constitutional? Should the courts do more to enforce...
Federal Courts and Nominations
December 9, 2019

How Will the Justices Rule?

The New York Times Upfront
The Supreme Court is considering important cases this term on a variety of hot-button issues