Constitutional Accountability Center Constitutional Accountability Center
Access to Justice

RELEASE: Important Win for Accountability in Thompson v. Clark 

WASHINGTON – On news this morning of the Supreme Court’s ruling in Thompson v. Clark—allowing people to sue police officers under Section 1983 for instigating baseless criminal charges against them once those charges have been dropped—Constitutional Accountability Center Senior Appellate Counsel Brian Frazelle said:

Today’s ruling is an important win for accountability. The Court today reaffirmed that police officers can be held accountable under the Fourth Amendment for false accusations that cause a person to be seized without justification. And, rejecting the argument of the police, the Court refused to limit victims’ ability to hold officers accountable for such false accusations based on dubious comparisons to the rules of common law torts. Section 1983 was passed to provide redress for constitutional violations, and as the Court has repeatedly emphasized, it is appropriate to use common law rules as a model only when doing so is consistent with the constitutional right at stake—here, the right to be secure against unreasonable seizures.

#

Resources:

CAC case page in Thompson v. Clark: https://www.theusconstitution.org/litigation/thompson-v-clark/

CAC ISSUE BRIEF: Repairing Our System of Constitutional Accountability: Reflections on the 150th Anniversary of Section 1983, David Gans, November 10, 2021: https://www.theusconstitution.org/think_tank/issue-brief-repairing-our-system-of-constitutional-accountability-reflections-on-the-150th-anniversary-of-section-1983/

##

Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history. Visit CAC’s website at www.theusconstitution.org.

###

More from Access to Justice

Access to Justice
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Taylor v. Healthcare Associates of Texas

In United States ex rel. Taylor v. Healthcare Associates of Texas, the Fifth Circuit is considering whether the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act violate Article II of the U.S. Constitution.
Access to Justice
U.S. Supreme Court

Flowers Foods v. Brock

In Flowers Foods v. Brock, the Supreme Court is considering whether the Federal Arbitration Act exempts from arbitration “last-mile” delivery drivers who transport goods between two points in the same state to their final destinations,...
Access to Justice
U.S. Supreme Court

T.M. v. University of Maryland Medical System

In T.M. v. University of Maryland Medical System, the Supreme Court is considering whether the Rooker-Feldman doctrine requires dismissal of a request for relief from a state-court decision that did not reach the state’s highest...
Access to Justice
January 14, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Justices Pose Difficult Questions to State-Affiliated Corporation that Claims Immunity from Suit

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Galette v....
By: Brian R. Frazelle, Harith Khawaja
Access to Justice
U.S. Supreme Court

Galette v. New Jersey Transit Corp. and New Jersey Transit Corp. v. Colt

In Galette v. New Jersey Transit Corporation and New Jersey Transit Corporation v. Colt, the Supreme Court is considering whether state-affiliated corporations have sovereign immunity.
Access to Justice
October 6, 2025

RELEASE: Supreme Court Considers the Scope of a Defendant’s Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Villarreal v....