Civil and Human Rights

RELEASE: NEW ISSUE BRIEF: Speech and Its Relationship to Equality: Constitutional Values in the Digital Age

“When confronting lies, hate, and harmful propaganda online—which we can expect to reach a fever pitch in coming weeks—social media companies can and should strive to reflect our whole Constitution’s core values, including free speech, equality, and due process.” — CAC’s David Gans

WASHINGTON – Today, Constitutional Accountability Center is releasing a new issue brief that explores the intersection of constitutional principles of free speech and equality, and how they translate to social media. It urges social media companies to strike a balance between constitutional values of speech and equality when deciding how to handle harmful content on social media platforms. 

Titled Speech and Its Relationship to Equality: Constitutional Values in the Digital Age, and authored by David Gans, Director of CAC’s Human Rights, Civil Rights, and Citizenship Program, the issue brief explores ideas of equality as a free speech value, how to take account of both speech and equality, as well as guidelines on how social media companies can balance those constitutional values. An excerpt: 

There is a robust debate today over how platforms should regulate speech on social media, almost all of it focusing on whether the platforms’ content moderation policies are consistent with free speech values. This is too narrow in multiple ways. In the first place, free speech values do not exist above other constitutional principles. We must strike a balance between constitutional values of freedom of speech and equality. But most of the debate treats free speech as the only relevant part of our constitutional heritage. In the second place, content moderation policies, while extremely important, are only one piece of the puzzle. We cannot understand how to reconcile our constitutional values without understanding three related and interlocking problems: (1) the many ways the algorithms employed by social media companies have helped to amplify extreme, hateful speech, effectively giving those who spread hate a virtual bullhorn; (2) content moderation policies that empower the companies to silence certain voices, and (3) the social media companies’ lack of transparency about their decision-making processes… [U]nderstanding the constitutional duty to strike a balance between speech and equality can help inform efforts to address the immensely complicated and difficult problems of platform governance. 

CAC’s research on constitutional values in a digital era, in part supported by funding from Google, helps advance “a critically important conversation as the nation heads into perhaps the most momentous election in our lifetimes,” said CAC’s David Gans, author of today’s issue brief. “When confronting lies, hate, and harmful propaganda online—which we can expect to reach a fever pitch in coming weeks—social media companies can and should strive to reflect our whole Constitution’s core values, including free speech, equality, and due process. Striking this balance is never easy, but it is essential if we are to do justice to the fundamental constitutional values we all hold dear.”

#

Resources:

Speech and Its Relationship to Equality: Constitutional Values in the Digital Age, CAC Issue Brief, David H. Gans, May 21, 2020: https://www.theusconstitution.org/think_tank/issue-brief-speech-and-its-relationship-to-equality-constitutional-values-in-the-digital-age/

##

Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history. Visit CAC’s website at www.theusconstitution.org.

###

More from Civil and Human Rights

Civil and Human Rights
U.S. Supreme Court

Stanley v. City of Sanford

In Stanley v. City of Sanford, the Supreme Court is considering whether the Americans with Disabilities Act protects against disability discrimination with respect to retirement benefits distributed after employment. 
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. Supreme Court

United States v. Skrmetti

In United States v. Skrmetti, the Supreme Court is considering whether Tennessee’s ban on providing gender-affirming medical care to transgender adolescents violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Civil and Human Rights
July 31, 2024

Supreme Court Allows Cities to Punish Homelessness

The Regulatory Review
At the end of its 2023-24 term, the U.S. Supreme Court issued several divided decisions...
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Civil and Human Rights
June 28, 2024

RELEASE: Ignoring constitutional history and original meaning, conservative majority allows city governments to punish people for sleeping in public even if they have nowhere else to go

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in City of Grants Pass...
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Civil and Human Rights
June 20, 2024

RELEASE: Supreme Court decision keeps the door open to accountability for police officers who make false charges

WASHINGTON, DC – Following this morning’s decision at the Supreme Court in Chiaverini v. City...
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Civil and Human Rights
June 11, 2024

The People Who Dismantled Affirmative Action Have a New Strategy to Crush Racial Justice

Slate
Last summer, in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard College, the Supreme Court’s conservative supermajority struck...
By: David H. Gans