Corporate Accountability

RELEASE: Supreme Court Leaves Some Corporations Answerable to Alien Tort Statute

WASHINGTON – Following the Supreme Court’s ruling today in Nestlé USA, Inc. v. John Doe I, Constitutional Accountability Center President Elizabeth Wydra issued the following reaction:

Today, the Supreme Court held that two American corporations, Nestle USA and Cargill, that allegedly contributed to the perpetration of child slavery in the Ivory Coast could not be sued in U.S. court because most of the challenged conduct occurred abroad. This decision is disappointing, particularly for the respondents, who had been forced as children to work on cocoa plantations.

But the Court refrained from striking an even larger blow: the Court initially agreed to hear these cases to consider whether the Alien Tort Statute (ATS), which allows federal district courts to hear suits for torts “committed in violation of the law of nations,” exempts all corporations from suit.

Rather than decide that question and potentially foreclose future suits like this one, the Court resolved these cases on the ground that a “mere corporate presence” in the United States is insufficient to open the door to federal court.

As Justice Gorsuch pointed out in his concurring opinion, which echoed CAC’s amicus brief in support of the respondents, “That is a good thing: The notion that corporations are immune from suit under the ATS cannot be reconciled with the statutory text and original understanding,” and the Court properly declined to go down that road. Justice Alito also echoed CAC’s amicus brief in his dissenting opinion when he acknowledged that “[c]orporate status does not justify special immunity.”

Although today’s decision is disappointing and will have unfortunate repercussions for the victims in this case and beyond, we remain hopeful that the Court will continue to recognize that the ATS, in accordance with its text and Congress’s plan in passing it, allows federal district courts to hear suits against American corporations for violations of international law.



CAC case page in Nestlé USA, Inc. v. John Doe I; Cargill, Inc. v. John Doe I:


Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history. Visit CAC’s website at


More from Corporate Accountability

Corporate Accountability
July 1, 2021

QUICK TAKE: The Chamber of Commerce at the Supreme Court: 2020-2021

Corporate America had a dominating success rate at the Court this term, with the U.S....
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra, Brian R. Frazelle
Corporate Accountability
January 19, 2021

SCOTUS Weighs in on the Diversity of Media Ownership

During this term, the Supreme Court is considering two consolidated cases, FCC v. Prometheus Radio...
By: Becca Damante, Tekla Taylor
Corporate Accountability
December 9, 2020

Supreme Court hints FHFA’s Calabria could keep job after all

American Banker
WASHINGTON — Ever since the Supreme Court agreed to hear a case challenging the constitutionality...
By: Ashwin Phatak, By Hannah Lang
Corporate Accountability
U.S. Supreme Court

FCC v. Prometheus Radio Project; National Association of Broadcasters v. Prometheus Radio Project

In FCC v. Prometheus Radio Project and National Association of Broadcasters v. Prometheus Radio Project, the Supreme Court considered whether the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) adequately assessed the effects that certain regulation changes would have...
Corporate Accountability
December 9, 2020

CAC Alert: Oral Arguments in Collins v. Mnuchin

CAC Appellate Counsel Ashwin Phatak discusses oral arguments in a #SCOTUS case that will determine...
By: Ashwin Phatak
Corporate Accountability
December 1, 2020

CAC Alert: Oral Arguments in Nestlé USA, Inc. v. John Doe I and Cargill, Inc. v. John Doe I

CAC Appellate Counsel Dayna Zolle discusses oral arguments in the #SCOTUS case that could determine...
By: Dayna Zolle