Corporate Accountability

RELEASE: Supreme Court Upholds Important Tool For Courts to Enforce Securities Laws

WASHINGTON – On news that the U.S. Supreme Circuit issued its decision in Liu v. SEC, holding that “a disgorgement award that does not exceed a wrongdoer’s net profits and is awarded for victims is” permissible equitable relief, CAC President Elizabeth Wydra issued the following statement:

Today’s ruling that federal courts may impose disgorgement awards in cases involving violations of the nation’s securities laws, requiring ill-gotten gains to be distributed from perpetrators to victims, is an important victory. 

As we argued on behalf of Members of Congress, the courts of appeals have unanimously held for over fifty years that disgorgement falls within the general equity powers that Congress gave district courts when they hear cases involving violations of the nation’s securities laws. In fact, Congress has premised key provisions of law in this area on the existence of disgorgement authority. The Supreme Court was right not to disturb Congress’s legislative plan that disgorgement be available to help enforce the nation’s securities laws.

#

Resources:

CAC brief on behalf of Members of Congress in Liu v. SEC: https://www.theusconstitution.org/litigation/liu-v-sec/ 

##

Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history. Visit CAC’s website at www.theusconstitution.org.

###

More from Corporate Accountability

Corporate Accountability
April 23, 2024

RELEASE: At the Supreme Court, Starbucks’s Arguments Run Headlong into the History of American Labor Law

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Starbucks v....
By: Smita Ghosh
Corporate Accountability
April 22, 2024

TV (Gray TV): CAC’s Ghosh Joins Gray TV to Discuss NLRB Case at Supreme Court

Gray TV Washington News Bureau
Corporate Accountability
April 2, 2024

The Supreme Court May Give Us Another 2008 Financial Crisis

The Lever
A new case could decimate state-level consumer protections against predatory banking practices.
By: Smita Ghosh, Katya Schwenk
Corporate Accountability
U.S. Supreme Court

Starbucks Corp. v. McKinney

In Starbucks Corp. v. McKinney, the Supreme Court is considering what standard courts should apply when deciding whether to grant a National Labor Relations Board request for a temporary injunction to halt an alleged unfair...
Corporate Accountability
February 27, 2024

RELEASE: At Oral Argument, Justices Recognize Profound Effect of Banking Case on State Efforts to Protect Consumers

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the U.S. Supreme Court this morning in Cantero...
By: Smita Ghosh
Corporate Accountability
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

National Association of Private Fund Managers v. Securities and Exchange Commission

In National Association of Private Fund Managers v. Securities and Exchange Commission, the Fifth Circuit is determining whether Congress granted the SEC the authority to regulate private fund advisers.