Civil and Human Rights

Report: Obama administration to file brief against Prop 8

The Department of Justice will support opponents of California’s gay marriage ban in their SCOTUS case

 

By Jillian Rayfield

 

The Obama Administration will reportedly file a brief in opposition to California’s ban on gay marriage known as Proposition 8.

 

NBC News cited “administration officials” who say that the White House will argue that the Supreme Court should uphold a ruling by a lower court striking down the law, on the grounds that it violates the 14th Amendment.

 

From NBC News:

 

After first suggesting it would not get involved, the Obama Administration will file a friend-of-the-court brief late today in support of the two gay couples who launched the fight over the issue four years ago, the officials said. Today is the last day for filing briefs in support of the couples’ position.

 

The administration last year signaled it might stay on the sidelines. In May, when President Obama first said that “same-sex couples should be able to get married,” he added that it was not a matter for the federal government.

 

The Supreme Court is taking up the case in late March, and will first decide whether supporters of Prop 8 have standing in the case. If they do, the Court will then rule on the merits.

 

The Court is also considering a challenge to the Defense of Marriage Act, the ban on same-sex marriages for the purposes of receiving federal benefits. The Obama Administration announced in February, 2011 that it would no longer defend DOMA in court, but House Republicans elected to continue on with the defense through the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group.

 

On Thursday, thirteen states will also file briefs with the Supreme Court arguing that Prop 8 is unconstitutional. Fifteen will file briefs in opposition to DOMA on Friday. Other groups, like the libertarian Cato Institute and the liberal Constitutional Accountability Center have filed similar briefs this week in opposition to both laws.

More from Civil and Human Rights

Civil and Human Rights
April 3, 2025

Debate over transgender rights grows more fraught in new Trump era

The Christian Science Monitor
Actions by the Trump administration have been pushing back on transgender inclusion, amid sharp public...
Civil and Human Rights
March 19, 2025

Viewpoint: The North Dakota Constitution’s protections include reproductive autonomy

North Dakota's Grand Forks Herald
The Court should live up to North Dakota’s history as a state with some of...
By: Nargis Aslami
Civil and Human Rights
February 27, 2025

What You Should Know About the Right to Protection in the Trump Era

Washington Monthly
The 14th Amendment was meant to enforce the laws equally, not put vulnerable populations in...
By: David H. Gans
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington

Shilling v. Trump

In Shilling v. Trump, the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington is considering whether Trump’s Executive Order categorically barring transgender persons from serving in the military is unconstitutional.
Civil and Human Rights
February 19, 2025

History of the North Dakota Constitution Amicus Brief in Access Independent Health Services Inc., d/b/a Red River Women’s Clinic v. Wrigley

Center for Reproductive Rights
Amicus is the Constitutional Accountability Center, a think tank and public interest law firm dedicated...
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Talbott v. Trump

In Talbott v. Trump, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is considering whether Trump’s Executive Order categorically barring transgender persons from serving in the military is unconstitutional.