Corporate Accountability

Supreme Court Hands Chamber Of Commerce Blockbuster Pro-Corporate Term

By Amanda Terkel

 

WASHINGTON — It was another good year for the Chamber of Commerce at the nation’s highest court, which has increasingly taken a corporate tilt under Chief Justice John Roberts.

 

The Chamber had a 78 percent success rate in the Supreme Court cases it intervened in this term. In other words, it won 14 and lost three cases in which it filed amicus briefs. An additional case was considered neither a win nor a loss because the Court ruled on a separate matter.

 

In the most controversial cases — the ones that divided the court 5-4 along ideological lines — the Chamber was undefeated, winning all eight.

 

Tom Donnelly, counsel at the Constitutional Accountability Center, has been tracking the Chamber’s success rate. He noted in the last Supreme Court term, the Chamber actually went undefeated. Nevertheless, there’s no question that the most recent term was a victory for the business lobbying group.

 

“It’s typically strong in the sense that the issues involved are issues that we see term by term — the Court continuing to push the law in a pro-business direction,” said Donnelly. “In the context of arbitration, the Court is making it harder for small claimants … trying to join together to hold those businesses accountable. The Court is closing off those collective actions. Similarly, it’s cutting back on class actions generally [and making it] harder for employees to succeed in civil rights claims.”

 

In two cases decided on Monday, for example, the Supreme Court made it more difficult for workers to sue businesses for retaliation and discrimination.

 

The Constitutional Accountability Center has also compared how the Chamber has fared under recent chief justices, finding that the Roberts court has been significantly friendlier to the lobbying group.

 

SCOTUSblog recently published a study that found the Chamber is heavily involved in the cert.-stage, when the justices decide which cases they are going to take up, as well. In fact, the Chamber filed more briefs urging the court to intervene in cases than any other group and had one of the highest success rates.

 

The Chamber did not return a request for comment.

 

List of Chamber cases, via the CAC:

 

Win:

American Express v. Italian Colors Restaurant

American Trucking Associations v. City of Los Angeles

Comcast v. Behrend

Gabelli v. SEC

Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. Symczyk

Horne v. Department of Agriculture

Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum

Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management District

Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. Bartlett

PPL Corp. and Subsidiaries v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. Knowles

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. Nassar

U.S. Airways v. McCutchen

Vance v. Ball State University

 

Loss:

Amgen v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds

City of Arlington, Texas v. FCC

Oxford Health Plans LLC v. Sutter

 

Other:

Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center

More from Corporate Accountability

Corporate Accountability
April 24, 2026

How the Supreme Court will have a major impact on the economy this spring

CNN
CAC Chief Counsel Brianne Gorod spoke to CNN about big business at the Supreme Court. Read...
Corporate Accountability
May 18, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Considers Constitutionality of FCC Enforcement Process

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Federal Communications...
By: Joshua Blecher-Cohen, Smita Ghosh
Corporate Accountability
U.S. Supreme Court

Federal Communications Commission v. AT&T and Verizon v. Federal Communications Commission

In Federal Communications Commission v. AT&T and Verizon v. Federal Communications Commission, the Supreme Court is considering whether the FCC’s two-stage civil-enforcement process violates the Seventh Amendment.
Corporate Accountability
January 15, 2026

January Newsletter: CAC Keeps Up the Fight for Corporate Accountability

Corporate Accountability
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Millennia Housing Management v. Department of Housing and Urban Development

In Millennia Housing Management v. Department of Housing and Urban Development, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit is considering a challenge to the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s authority to...
Corporate Accountability
July 2, 2025

Moneyed Interests Still Prevail at the Supreme Court (2024-2025 Term)

The Court Continues to Favor Corporations over Workers, Consumers, and the Environment.
By: Brian R. Frazelle, Ana Builes