Corporate Accountability

Who’s In Charge? An Awkward Monday Is Coming For This Federal Agency

By Miles Parks

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau effectively has two leaders right now, which should lead to a confusing Monday morning back from the Thanksgiving holiday — and eventually a battle in court.

Both the departing head of the CFPB, Obama appointee Richard Cordray, and the White House have named interim leaders of an agency that has been engulfed in partisan politics since its inception as part of the Dodd-Frank regulatory reform bill in 2010.

The agency was created to be a watchdog for consumers when they interact with almost all kinds of financial institutions.

“Nearly every American who deals with banks or a credit card company or has a mortgage has been affected by rules the agency put in place,” says The Associated Press.

Because of the agency’s broad mandate, whoever is empowered as director has a huge role in deciding what or how much the organization decides to regulate.

The legislation that created the agency is fairly clear in noting how a vacancy at the top of the CFPB should be filled. The deputy director “shall serve as acting director in the absence or unavailability of the director,” the law says.

That would put newly named Deputy Director Leandra English, who had previously served as the agency’s chief of staff, into the role once Cordray’s resignation became official at close of business on Friday.

President Trump’s White House, however, says a different law takes precedence and gives Trump the power to appoint whom he wants.

Trump announced in a statement on Friday that Mick Mulvaney, the director of the White House Office of Management and Budget and someone who once called the CFPB a “sick, sad joke,” would become acting director of the agency.

Senior administration officials say that the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998 allows the president to supersede the founding legislation of the CFPB in determining who will lead the agency until a permanent replacement is nominated by Trump and confirmed by the Senate.

“We think [Mulvaney will] show up Monday and go into the office and start working,” one White House official said.

Democrats and progressives are unsurprisingly outraged at the move, while Republicans are drooling at the idea of overhauling an agency they’ve long criticized for regulation overreach.

Trump tweeted his disdain for the CFPB on Saturday afternoon, saying “Financial Institutions have been devastated and unable to properly serve the public. We will bring it back to life!”

Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., proposed the creation of the agency in her previous job at Harvard Law School, before she was elected to the Senate. She says Trump “can’t override” the legislation that created the CFPB.

“President Trump may decide he doesn’t care what Dodd-Frank says, but he doesn’t get the final say,” Brianne Gorod, the chief counsel at the left-leaning Constitutional Accountability Center, wrote in a blog post. “If there ends up being a dispute about who’s the rightful head of the CFPB, the final say will rest with the courts.”

Gorod says if the courts “follow the text, structure, and history of Dodd-Frank,” then English would be named acting director.

But White House officials said in a conference call with reporters on Saturday that they expect English to report to work as deputy director on Monday, under Mulvaney.

“With the resignation of Richard Cordray, there is now a wonderful opportunity to completely reform what has been a rogue agency that often harmed the very consumers it was charged with helping,” said Rep. Jeb Hensarling, R-Texas, the chairman of the House Financial Services Committee.

Prior to Mulvaney’s current post in the Trump White House, he was elected to the House of Representatives in 2010, as part of the Tea Party wave that made its name by bashing the sort of regulation the CFPB was designed to recommend.

The agency has taken legal action against banks, mortgage companies and myriad other financial institutions, notably fining Wells Fargo $100 million last year for secretly opening bank accounts on behalf of customers without their authorization.

Whoever ends up leading the agency will serve as acting director until a new director is confirmed by the Senate, a process that could take months, or longer.

Of the 613 “key positions” that are nominated by the president and that require Senate confirmation, according to The Washington Post, Trump has filled roughly a third of them in his first year in office.

White House officials said Saturday they expect Trump to nominate a new CFPB director in the “upcoming weeks.”

Until then, it’ll either be Mulvaney or English at the helm.

“Everyone says the law is on their side,” said NPR White House correspondent Tamara Keith, on Weekend Edition Saturday. “One thing we can be certain of is [that] there is going to be a legal fight.”

More from Corporate Accountability

Corporate Accountability
June 20, 2024

RELEASE: In narrow ruling, Supreme Court rejects baseless effort to shield corporate-derived income from taxation

WASHINGTON, DC – Following this morning’s decision at the Supreme Court in Moore v. United...
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Corporate Accountability
June 13, 2024

RELEASE: Supreme Court’s Disappointing Decision in Starbucks Union Case Fails to Account for History

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Starbucks Corp. v. McKinney,...
By: Smita Ghosh
Corporate Accountability
May 30, 2024

Supreme Court gives New Yorkers second shot in escrow interest-payment fight

Courthouse News Service
WASHINGTON (CN) — The Supreme Court on Thursday gave New York homeowners another shot at...
By: Smita Ghosh, Kelsey Reichmann
Corporate Accountability
May 30, 2024

RELEASE: Grounded in Text and History, Today’s Decision is a Win for America’s Consumers

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Cantero v. Bank of...
By: Smita Ghosh
Corporate Accountability
May 15, 2024

The Fifth Circuit Is In the Tank For Corporate Power

Balls and Strikes
When the government does things that megacorporations don’t like, they know exactly where to go...
Corporate Accountability
April 23, 2024

RELEASE: At the Supreme Court, Starbucks’s Arguments Run Headlong into the History of American Labor Law

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Starbucks v....
By: Smita Ghosh