Corporations and the Supreme Court
Since Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito joined the Supreme Court (October Term 2005), the Court has become increasingly friendly toward Big Business, often elevating the interests of corporations over those of individuals. Since 2010, we have tracked this trend through our reports on the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and its record before the Roberts Court. Below are some of the highlights of our analyses, as well as up-to-date statistics on the Chamber’s win-loss rate during the current Term. (To read our annual report on the Court’s most recent Term, click here.)
Past Term Overview (October Term 2017)
- Animal Science Products v. Hebei Welcome Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.
- China Agritech v. Resh
- Digital Realty Trust v. Somers
- Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Navarro
- Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis / Ernst & Young LLP v. Morris / National Labor Relations Board v. Murphy Oil USA (consolidated)
- Jesner v. Arab Bank, PLC
- Lucia v. Securities and Exchange Commission
- Marinello v. U.S.
- National Association of Manufacturers v. Department of Defense
0 Pending Cases
Cases Dismissed Without Decision
CAC’s long-term analysis demonstrates the Chamber of Commerce’s increased rate of success before the Roberts Court, as well as the ideological divide among the Justices with respect to the Chamber’s positions.
Increasing Support for the Chamber
Since Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito joined the Supreme Court, the Court has ruled for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s position 70% of the time
How Often Each Justice Rules for the Chamber of Commerce
There is a clear ideological divide among the Justices when it comes to business cases