Federal Courts and Nominations

CAC letter in support of Kristen Clarke’s confirmation to be the Assistant Attorney General of the Civil Rights Division

The United States Department of Justice (“DOJ” or “the Department”) should be guided by the principle that Thomas Jefferson believed was the “most sacred of the duties of government”: “to do equal and impartial justice” to all. The Department plays a critical role in our country’s noble pursuit of equal and impartial justice, helping to realize values embedded in the Constitution and codified in a long list of federal statutes that help implement constitutional guarantees.

At the heart of the Department’s mission to provide and promote justice lies the Civil Rights Division. Created in 1957, the Civil Rights Division (“Division”) “works to uphold the civil and constitutional rights of all Americans, particularly some of the most vulnerable members of our society. The Division enforces federal statutes prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, color, sex (including pregnancy, sexual orientation, and gender identity), disability, religion, familial status, national origin, and citizenship status;” challenges discriminatory laws and policies in court; and proactively develops policy and legislative proposals. Therefore, to help move DOJ closer to the promise of equal justice under law for all, the Assistant Attorney General who leads the Division must have a certain set of qualifications: a deep commitment to the core constitutional principles of liberty, equality, and fairness; a history of defending and/or advancing substantive fundamental rights; and a demonstrated willingness to respect the whole Constitution and the values therein, whatever their own policy preferences, or those of the President.

Kristen Clarke, President Joe Biden’s nominee for Assistant Attorney General of the Civil Rights Division, has had a career that exemplifies the qualities necessary for the job for which she has been nominated. From a young age she committed herself to being “a person who could use the power of the law to stand up for vulnerable communities.” And when speaking of the Department of Justice, she noted that it “is to stand above the political fray and ensure that its work is carried out with faithfulness to the rule of law.”

Ms. Clarke would bring a breadth of experience and civil rights leadership to the Division. After graduating from Columbia Law School, Ms. Clarke began her career in the prestigious Honors Program at DOJ. She then served for six years as a career attorney in the Civil Rights Division—the same office she has now been nominated to lead. There she worked in the Division’s Voting Section and handled voting rights and redistricting cases. She also served in the division’s Criminal Section, where she prosecuted police misconduct cases, hate crimes, and human trafficking cases. Having been a career attorney in the Division, Ms. Clarke would bring to the post a deep knowledge of the office’s mission and the urgency of aggressively enforcing our nation’s federal civil rights laws.

More from Federal Courts and Nominations

Federal Courts and Nominations
January 17, 2024

The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights Sign-On Letter Prioritizing Diverse Judges

Dear Senator, On behalf of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights and the...
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 31, 2023

Liberal justices earn praise for ‘independence’ on Supreme Court, but Thomas truly stands alone, expert says

Fox News
Some democrats compare Justice Clarence Thomas to ‘Uncle Tom’ and house slave in ‘Django Unchained’
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra, By Brianna Herlihy
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 7, 2023

In Her First Term, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson ‘Came to Play’

The New York Times
From her first week on the Supreme Court bench in October to the final day...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra, by Adam Liptak
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 8, 2023

The Supreme Court’s continuing march to the right

Major legal rulings that dismantled the use of race in college admissions, undermined protections for...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra, by Tierney Sneed
Federal Courts and Nominations
June 25, 2023

Federal judge defends Clarence Thomas in new book, rejects ‘pot shots’ at Supreme Court

A federal appeals court judge previously on short lists for the Supreme Court is taking the rare...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra
Federal Courts and Nominations
May 1, 2023

Supreme Court, done with arguments, turns to decisions

Roll Call
The justices have released opinions at a slow rate this term, and many of the...
By: Brianne J. Gorod, By Michael Macagnone