Immigration and Citizenship

Justices Skeptical Of Aspects Of Arizona’s SB 1070 Law

Echoing CAC Brief, Constitution’s Text, History and Structure Key Issues In Argument

Washington, DC – After attending today’s arguments at the Supreme Court over the constitutionality of Arizona’s SB 1070 anti-immigration law, Constitutional Accountability Center released the following statement.

CAC President Doug Kendall said, “Solicitor General Verilli effectively explained why SB 1070 threatens the federal government’s foreign policy and immigration authority, and why the law conflicts with the Founders’ design. The Constitution demands ‘uniform’ federal rules on naturalization and immigration, and Arizona’s law fundamentally disrupts this uniformity.”

CAC Chief Counsel Elizabeth Wydra said, “SB 1070 is a single-minded, aggressive ‘attrition through enforcement’ policy that directly conflicts with the Constitution’s delegation of immigration authority to the federal government.  The nation’s Founders unmistakably gave the national government the power to speak for the United States on immigration matters and foreign affairs,” Wydra continued, “and it appeared that a majority of the justices had problems with at least some provisions of the Arizona law.  Hopefully, the justices will recognize that all of the challenged provisions should fail for the same reason: Arizona does not have the right to put in place its own ‘attrition through enforcement’ immigration policy.”

#

Resources:

*  CAC’s “friend of the court” brief in Arizona v. United States:  http://theusconstitution.org/cases/briefs/arizona-v-us-us-v-arizona/arizona-v-us

*  Elizabeth Wydra, Huffington Post (front page), “Arizona’s ‘Show Me Your Papers’ Law Gets Its Day in Court — and Congress,” April 24, 2012:  http://www.huffingtonpost.com/elizabeth-b-wydra/arizonas-show-me-your-pap_b_1449460.html

*  Elizabeth Wydra, New York Times, “The Constitution Settles It,” April 22, 2012: http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2012/04/22/how-states-should-approach-immigration/the-constitution-limits-states-immigration-policy

##

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

More from Immigration and Citizenship

Voting Rights and Democracy
April 29, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court’s Conservative Supermajority, Once Again, Guts the Voting Rights Act and Further Enables Racial Discrimination in Voting

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Louisiana v. Callais, a...
By: David H. Gans
Access to Justice
April 28, 2026

CAC Release: In Cisco v. Doe Argument, Justices Grapple with the Scope of Liability Under Two Critical Human Rights Statutes

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Cisco Systems...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, Harith Khawaja
Access to Justice
April 27, 2026

Human Rights Suit Over Cisco Work for China Heads to Supreme Court

Bloomberg Law
CAC Senior Appellate Counsel Miriam Becker-Cohen was interviewed by Bloomberg Law about our brief in Cisco...
Criminal Law
April 27, 2026

CAC Release: Justices Push Back Against Government’s Claim of Unrestricted Access to Cell-Phone Location Information

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Chatrie v....
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Rule of Law
April 25, 2026

The Chilling Message Behind Trump’s Attack On The SPLC

Huffington Post
CAC Vice President Praveen Fernandes was interviewed by HuffPost about Trump's attacks on the Southern...
Access to Justice
April 17, 2026

The Most Offensive Thing a Supreme Court Justice Can Do Is Be Honest About the Supreme Court

Balls & Strikes
This Week In Other Stuff We Appreciated Judges Overseeing Louisiana’s Landmark Oil Cases Have Financial...