Access to Justice

Supreme Court Decision A Victory for the Constitution and For Millions Who Rely On Medicaid

Washington, DC – On news this morning of the Supreme Court’s decision in Wos v. EMA (formerly Delia v. EMA), holding that a North Carolina statute is preempted by the federal Medicaid law, the Director of Constitutional Accountability Center’s Access to Courts program, Rochelle Bobroff, released the following statement:

 

“Today’s majority opinion is a huge victory for the 62 million Americans – one out of every five – who depend on Medicaid for access to health care. This ruling makes clear that the Medicaid statute is as much a part of the Federal Code as any other, and displaces state laws that conflict with the program.”

 

#

 

Resources:

 

*  CAC’s “friend of the court” brief in Delia (Wos) v. EMA, together with AARP in support of Respondent, identified by the Court as E.M.A., “a child who was born with multiple serious birth injuries”: http://theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/delia-Amicus-Brief-AARP-CAC.pdf 

 

*  “A Lurking Threat to Federal Spending Clause Programs,” Rochelle Bobroff, January 3, 2013: http://theusconstitution.org/text-history/1757/lurking-threat-federal-spending-clause-programs 

 

*  “The Medicaid Program at a Glance,” Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured, March 2013: http://www.kff.org/medicaid/upload/7235-06.pd

 

##

 

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

 

###

More from Access to Justice

Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Jackler v. Merit Systems Protection Board

In Jackler v. Merit Systems Protection Board, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is considering whether the Trump administration can ignore critical civil service laws when removing Immigration Judges.
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Comey v. Department of Justice

In Comey v. Department of Justice, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York is considering whether the Attorney General can fire an Assistant U.S. Attorney in contravention of legal protections...
Civil and Human Rights
July 18, 2026

Arnie Arnesen Attitude July 16 2026

Attitude with Arnie Arnesen
CAC’s David H. Gans joined The Attitude with Arnie Arnesen to discuss the Reconstruction Amendments. Listen...
Access to Justice
----- Supreme Court -----

Crowther v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia

In Crowther v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia, the Supreme Court is considering whether employees of federally funded educational institutions can bring Title IX suits for sex discrimination.
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Wridt v. City of New York

In Wridt v. City of New York, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York is considering whether the NYPD’s mass surveillance system is unconstitutional.
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 16, 2026

CAC Release: Todd Blanche’s Record Disqualifies Him From Serving as America’s Lawyer

WASHINGTON, DC – In response to this week’s confirmation hearings on Todd Blanche’s nomination to...
By: Praveen Fernandes