Federal Courts and Nominations

D.C. Circuit Nominee Millett Goes To Full Senate On Party-Line Vote: Will Republicans Join Sen. McCain To Break The Grassley Filibuster?

Washington, DC – On news this morning that the Senate Judiciary Committee approved the nomination of Patricia Millett to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit by a strict party-line vote of 10-8, Constitutional Accountability Center Vice President Judith E. Schaeffer released the following reaction:

 

“First, we congratulate Pattie Millett on garnering the well-deserved confidence of a majority of the Judiciary Committee today. She is overwhelmingly qualified and totally uncontroversial – even earning praise from Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) during her hearing earlier this month. Millett should not only receive a yes-or-no vote from the full Senate, but she also deserves to be confirmed on a bipartisan basis, as soon as possible after the recess.”

 

“Having said that, the fact that no Republican on the Committee joined in moving Millett’s nomination forward is deeply disappointing. No Senator, Democrat or Republican, disputes how well qualified Millett is. Today’s vote by Committee Republicans reflects opposition for opposition’s sake. As Senator John McCain has said in coming out against filibustering President Obama’s nominees to the D.C. Circuit, ‘Elections have consequences.’ Yet with all of his GOP colleagues on the Committee united in support of Senator Charles Grassley’s clearly hypocritical and hyper-partisan bill to eliminate the three vacant seats on the D.C. Circuit, the Senate may once again be inching toward nuclear brinksmanship. The full Senate should brush Senator Grassley’s obstructionist ploy aside and give Pattie Millett the yes-or-no vote she deserves.”

 

#

 

Resources:

 

CAC letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee in support of Patricia Millett, July 17, 2013: http://theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/CAC_Letter_to_SJC_in_Support_of_Millett_Confirmation.pdf 

 

“Why is Senator Grassley Playing Hide-the-Ball Over the D.C. Circuit?” CAC Vice President Judith E. Schaeffer, July 26, 2013: http://theusconstitution.org/text-history/2164/why-senator-grassley-playing-hide-ball-over-dc-circuit 

 

 “The Next Nuclear Test,” CAC President Doug Kendall, July 25, 2013: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/doug-kendall/the-next-nuclear-test_b_3652286.html 

 

 “Will other Republican Senators Join McCain and Collins in Rebuffing Grassley’s Partisan Effort to Prevent D.C. Circuit Nominees From Getting a Vote?,” Judith E. Schaeffer, July 8, 2013: http://theusconstitution.org/text-history/2142/will-other-republican-senators-join-john-mccain-and-susan-collins-rebuffing 

 

“McCain: Obama’s 3 D.C. Circuit Nominees Deserve Votes,” June 18, 2013: http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/mccain-obamas-3-dc-circuit-nominees-deserve-votes 

 

 “Grassley’s ‘court-packing’ analogy goes astray,” Des Moines Register Editorial, June 16, 2013: http://www.indystar.com/article/D2/20130617/OPINION03/306170031/  

 

“It’s Not Packing, Just Filling the D.C. Bench,” Judith E. Schaeffer, May 24, 2013: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324787004578497511399066342.html   

 

“Grassley aims for GOP political spin on federal judiciary,” Doug Kendall, May 10, 2013: http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2013/05/10/grassley-aims-for-gop-political-spin-on-federal-judiciary/  

 

“Did Senator Grassley Not Check His Inbox? — His Proposal to Gut the D.C. Circuit Ignores the Judicial Conference,” Judith E. Schaeffer, April 17, 2013: http://theusconstitution.org/text-history/1959/did-senator-grassley-not-check-his-inbox-his-proposal-gut-dc-circuit-ignores 

 

##

 

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

 

###

More from Federal Courts and Nominations

Voting Rights and Democracy
April 29, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court’s Conservative Supermajority, Once Again, Guts the Voting Rights Act and Further Enables Racial Discrimination in Voting

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Louisiana v. Callais, a...
By: David H. Gans
Access to Justice
April 28, 2026

CAC Release: In Cisco v. Doe Argument, Justices Grapple with the Scope of Liability Under Two Critical Human Rights Statutes

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Cisco Systems...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, Harith Khawaja
Access to Justice
April 27, 2026

Human Rights Suit Over Cisco Work for China Heads to Supreme Court

Bloomberg Law
CAC Senior Appellate Counsel Miriam Becker-Cohen was interviewed by Bloomberg Law about our brief in Cisco...
Criminal Law
April 27, 2026

CAC Release: Justices Push Back Against Government’s Claim of Unrestricted Access to Cell-Phone Location Information

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Chatrie v....
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Rule of Law
April 25, 2026

The Chilling Message Behind Trump’s Attack On The SPLC

Huffington Post
CAC Vice President Praveen Fernandes was interviewed by HuffPost about Trump's attacks on the Southern...
Access to Justice
April 17, 2026

The Most Offensive Thing a Supreme Court Justice Can Do Is Be Honest About the Supreme Court

Balls & Strikes
This Week In Other Stuff We Appreciated Judges Overseeing Louisiana’s Landmark Oil Cases Have Financial...