New ‘Roberts at 10’ Snapshot: The Evolving Story Of John Roberts’s Stance On Federal Power

“Chief Justice Roberts’s views on the powers of Congress to solve national problems aren’t exactly what Judge Roberts presented them to be at his 2005 confirmation hearing.”

 

Washington, DC – For its “Roberts at 10” project, examining John Roberts’s first ten Terms as Chief Justice of the United States, Constitutional Accountability Center today is releasing its latest Snapshot: Roberts at 10: The Evolving Story of John Roberts and Congress’s Commerce Clause and Spending Clause Powers. Today’s release looks at Chief Justice Roberts’s approach to fundamental questions of the power of the federal government to solve national problems under key clauses of the U.S. Constitution. 

 

Read the new “Roberts at 10” snapshot here: http://theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/Roberts-at-10-Evolving-Story-of-John-Roberts-federal-power.pdf 

 

Today’s Snapshot begins by looking back at the answers then-Judge Roberts gave to the Senate Judiciary Committee in 2005 to questions about his likelihood of continuing the “states’ rights revolution” championed by his predecessor, Chief Justice William Rehnquist. With that as a baseline, Roberts’s record in major cases deciding questions of federal power since his confirmation are examined – with particular attention to the complex story of the challenge to the Affordable Care Act in NFIB v. Sebelius. Finally, it notes the discrepancy between what Roberts told the Senate and the Nation in 2005, and his jurisprudence in the Terms that followed. An excerpt from today’s Snapshot:

 

[I]t may be that the Chief Justice’s future decisions will help shed additional light on his decision in NFIB and on his views on federal power, more broadly.  At this point, though, it’s difficult to put too much stock in then-Judge Roberts’s confirmation hearing statements about how he saw Lopez and Morrison fitting into the 200-years of Commerce Clause jurisprudence that preceded them.

 

#

 

Additional Resources:

 

“Roberts at 10” Introductory Snapshot: A Look at the First Decade of John Roberts’s Tenure as Chief Justice: www.theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/Roberts-at-10-A-Look-at-the-First-Decade.pdf

 

“Roberts at 10” experts available for interviews: CAC President Doug Kendall and Appellate Counsel Brianne Gorod

 

##

 

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

 

###

More from

Voting Rights and Democracy
April 29, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court’s Conservative Supermajority, Once Again, Guts the Voting Rights Act and Further Enables Racial Discrimination in Voting

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Louisiana v. Callais, a...
By: David H. Gans
Access to Justice
April 28, 2026

CAC Release: In Cisco v. Doe Argument, Justices Grapple with the Scope of Liability Under Two Critical Human Rights Statutes

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Cisco Systems...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, Harith Khawaja
Access to Justice
April 27, 2026

Human Rights Suit Over Cisco Work for China Heads to Supreme Court

Bloomberg Law
CAC Senior Appellate Counsel Miriam Becker-Cohen was interviewed by Bloomberg Law about our brief in Cisco...
Criminal Law
April 27, 2026

CAC Release: Justices Push Back Against Government’s Claim of Unrestricted Access to Cell-Phone Location Information

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Chatrie v....
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Rule of Law
April 25, 2026

The Chilling Message Behind Trump’s Attack On The SPLC

Huffington Post
CAC Vice President Praveen Fernandes was interviewed by HuffPost about Trump's attacks on the Southern...
Access to Justice
April 17, 2026

The Most Offensive Thing a Supreme Court Justice Can Do Is Be Honest About the Supreme Court

Balls & Strikes
This Week In Other Stuff We Appreciated Judges Overseeing Louisiana’s Landmark Oil Cases Have Financial...