Immigration and Citizenship

Born in the USA?: The Historical and Constitutional Underpinnings of Birthright Citizenship

Details

Thursday, March 31, 2011
4:00 pm
American Constitution Society

On the first day of the 112th Congress, Representative Steve King (R-IA) introduced legislation in the U.S. House of Representatives seeking to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to “clarify” which classes of U.S.-born children are citizens of the United States at birth. Representative King’s bill reflects his assertion that the 14th Amendment does not guarantee citizenship at birth for U.S.-born children of temporary or undocumented immigrants. House Judiciary Committee Chair Lamar Smith (R-TX) agrees, and has declared his intention to hold hearings on the subject. Federal legislators are not the only ones to get into the mix. On January 5th, a group of state legislators launched their own challenge to the 14th Amendment at a press conference in Washington where they announced their plans to pass state laws that would ultimately trigger a Supreme Court ruling on the issue.

On March 31, 2011, the American Constitution Society and the Center for American Progress brought together leading thinkers to discuss current challenges to birthright citizenship and provide historical perspective to the debate about what the 14th Amendment guarantees.

More from Immigration and Citizenship

Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California

Al Otro Lado v. Trump

In Al Otro Lado v. Trump, the United States District Court for the Southern District of California is considering whether the Trump Administration can prohibit certain people from seeking asylum at ports of entry.
Immigration and Citizenship
November 20, 2025

Trump’s fight to redefine ‘American citizen’ returns to Supreme Court

Courthouse News Service
After winning round one, President Trump wants the justices to tee up a final showdown...
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

RAICES v. Noem

In RAICES v. Noem, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is considering whether the Trump Administration can prohibit certain people within the country from seeking asylum. 
Immigration and Citizenship
June 30, 2025

CAC Release: At the Fifth Circuit, the Government Argued that Alien Enemies Act Means Whatever the President Says. Its Drafters Couldn’t Have Agreed Less.

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth...
By: Smita Ghosh, Ana Builes
Immigration and Citizenship
June 27, 2025

Trump’s Invocation of the Alien Enemies Act Is Unlawful Because Tren de Aragua Is Not a Foreign Nation or Government

Since President Donald Trump invoked the Alien Enemies Act three months ago to send hundreds...
By: Ana Builes
Immigration and Citizenship
June 27, 2025

CAC Release: Supreme Court Decision on the Scope of Injunctions Fails to Acknowledge the Importance of the Constitution’s Birthright Citizenship Guarantee

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Trump v. CASA, Trump...