BREAKING: Justice Stevens Announces His Retirement

Justice John Paul Stevens announced this morning that he will retire from the Supreme Court at the end of this Term. CAC President and Founder, Doug Kendall, has released the following statement:

Justice John Paul Stevens will be remembered as a towering figure in Supreme Court history and one our greatest Justices. Throughout his tenure on the Court, Justice Stevens has displayed a deep knowledge of, and respect for, the Constitution’s text and history, underscored this Term by his opinion last week for the Court in Padilla v. Kentucky, and his brilliant 90-page dissent in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission.  In the last decade he has gone toe to toe with Justice Antonin Scalia and the Court’s other conservatives over the meaning of our Nation’s charter, winning more battles than he has lost, and showing that the Constitution itself points to progressive outcomes. We thank Justice Stevens for his decades of exemplary public service, and for his enormous contributions to the country and the law.

The American people love the Constitution. They want Justices on the Supreme Court who will faithfully interpret the law and apply the text, history, and principles of the Constitution, including all of the Amendments ratified by “We the People” in the past 220 years. CAC urges President Obama to nominate a successor to Justice Stevens who deeply respects the Constitution’s text and history and will be vigilant in protecting constitutionally-secured individual rights, including liberty and equality. We can think of no better tribute to John Paul Stevens.

More commentary to follow.

 

More from

Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Comey v. Department of Justice

In Comey v. Department of Justice, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York is considering whether the Attorney General can fire an Assistant U.S. Attorney in contravention of legal protections...
Civil and Human Rights
July 18, 2026

Arnie Arnesen Attitude July 16 2026

Attitude with Arnie Arnesen
CAC’s David H. Gans joined The Attitude with Arnie Arnesen to discuss the Reconstruction Amendments. Listen...
Access to Justice
----- Supreme Court -----

Crowther v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia

In Crowther v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia, the Supreme Court is considering whether employees of federally funded educational institutions can bring Title IX suits for sex discrimination.
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Wridt v. City of New York

In Wridt v. City of New York, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York is considering whether the NYPD’s mass surveillance system is unconstitutional.
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 16, 2026

CAC Release: Todd Blanche’s Record Disqualifies Him From Serving as America’s Lawyer

WASHINGTON, DC – In response to this week’s confirmation hearings on Todd Blanche’s nomination to...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DHS Probationary Employees 1 Class v. Department of Homeland Security

In DHS Probationary Employees 1 Class v. Department of Homeland Security, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is considering whether the Trump Administration’s efforts to unilaterally reshape the federal government through...