CAC’s Wydra Weighs in on Controversial Free Speech Case Snyder v. Phelps

Today the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the controversial free speech case Snyder v. Phelps.  WATCH CAC’s Chief Counsel Elizabeth Wydra weigh in on NBC’s Texas affiliate KTAL 6:
“It’s a funeral for God’s sake!” said Albert Snyder, Lance Corporal Matthew Snyder’s Father.

The procession had to be re-routed and the SWAT team was called in when Reverend Fred Phelps brought his “Thank God For Dead Soldiers” protest to Lance Corporal Matthew Snyder’s funeral in 2006.

“They turned it into a circus, a three-ring circus,” said Snyder.

Snyder said it sent him into a deep depression.

“These people are terrorists. They terrorize innocent families,” said Snyder.

A jury gave him 11 million dollars for emotional distress. But an appeals court overturned it saying the, ‘Most Hated Family In America,’ as one filmmaker called them, is protected by the First Amendment.

Funeral Protester Reverend Fred Phelps said, “He don’t have to like my preaching and I’ve got a sneaking feeling that he don’t.  But I’m pretty dog-gone sure that I’ve got the right to preach it and he’s got a right to object to it.”

Today the Supreme Court will consider whether that right interfered with the right of a private citizen to practice his religion.

Elizabeth Wydra of the Constitutional Accountability Center said, “This is about whether or not you have to pay the price for inflicting distress on someone rather than the government fining you or preventing you from speaking in the first place.”

The Westboro Baptist Church has protested some 200 military funerals…claiming God is killing American soldiers to punish the nation for embracing homosexuality.

More from

Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. Office of Management and Budget

In Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. Office of Management and Budget, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is considering whether President Trump’s Office of Management and...
Voting Rights and Democracy
April 29, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court’s Conservative Supermajority, Once Again, Guts the Voting Rights Act and Further Enables Racial Discrimination in Voting

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Louisiana v. Callais, a...
By: David H. Gans
Access to Justice
April 28, 2026

CAC Release: In Cisco v. Doe Argument, Justices Grapple with the Scope of Liability Under Two Critical Human Rights Statutes

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Cisco Systems...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, Harith Khawaja
Access to Justice
April 27, 2026

Human Rights Suit Over Cisco Work for China Heads to Supreme Court

Bloomberg Law
CAC Senior Appellate Counsel Miriam Becker-Cohen was interviewed by Bloomberg Law about our brief in Cisco...
Criminal Law
April 27, 2026

CAC Release: Justices Push Back Against Government’s Claim of Unrestricted Access to Cell-Phone Location Information

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Chatrie v....
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Rule of Law
April 25, 2026

The Chilling Message Behind Trump’s Attack On The SPLC

Huffington Post
CAC Vice President Praveen Fernandes was interviewed by HuffPost about Trump's attacks on the Southern...