This Day in Constitutional History: The 20th Amendment clips lame ducks’ wings

On February 6th, 1933, the 20th Amendment to the US Constituion was ratified, a “rather technical amendment clipping the wings of electoral lame ducks,” as described by Akhil Amar in America’s Constitution: A Biography.

“Proposed in March 1932 and ratified in early 1933, the Twentieth aimed to reduce the power of lame-duck politicians—public servants who had been repudiated by the voters at the polls but who had yet to be replaced by their spring-chicken successors. Tackling the problem of a lame-duck president, Section 1 moved up Inauguration Day from the old March 4 to a new date, January 20. Current events gave the issue special poignancy. When Congress proposed the amendment, everyone know that President Herbert Hoover was unlikely to be reelected in November. Yet everyone also understood that the soon-t-be-lame –duck president would remain in power for four months after being repudiated, with no mandate (and perhaps little inclination) to do anything, despite the widespread view that immediate action was needed to pull the country out of its Depression.

Although none of this hastened FDR’s inauguration—under a time-delay rule, a la Prohibition, the new political calendar would not become operative until the following electoral cycle—the amendment’s prompt ratification did mean that future generations would not have to wait as Depression-era Americans had been made to.”

Is the new shorter interval still too long? See 2009 commentary from CAC’s Judith Schaeffer.

More from

Rule of Law
May 28, 2026

Congressional Democrats argue in filing that White House ballroom construction shouldn’t proceed without Congress’ consent

CBS News
CAC's brief on behalf of Members of Congress opposing construction on Trump's unconstitutional ballroom were...
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

National Trust for Historic Preservation v. National Park Service

In National Trust for Historic Preservation v. National Park Service, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit is considering whether President Trump can unilaterally demolish the White House’s East Wing and build a...
Access to Justice
May 28, 2026

CAC Release: A Victory for Text, History, and Delivery Workers in Flowers Foods v. Brock

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Flowers Foods v. Brock,...
Criminal Law
May 28, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Recognizes Clear Pathway to Habeas Relief in Mississippi Jury Race-Discrimination Case

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Pitchford v. Cain, a...
Criminal Law
May 28, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Majority Rules that Judges Cannot Consider Changing Views of Crime when Reducing Sentences

WASHINGTON, DC – Following the Supreme Court’s decision this morning in Rutherford v. United States...
Criminal Law
May 28, 2026

CAC Release: Court’s Commitment to Text and History Falters in Compassionate Release Case

WASHINGTON, DC – Following the Supreme Court’s decision in Fernandez v. United States, a case...