Civil and Human Rights

This Day in Constitutional History: Senate proposes 26th Amendment to lower the voting age to 18

On March 10, 1971, the US Senate voted in favor of amending the Constitution to allow 18 year olds to vote.

The bill passed the Senate 94-0 and was fully ratified just four months later, driven by the “steady civic and moral drumbeat” of the debate over the Vietnam War and the civil rights and voting rights movements. (See “The 26th Amendment and the Progressive Constitution” for further history.)

The 26th Amendment reads:

Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of age.

Section 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

The 26th Amendment became the sixth constitutional amendment dedicated to expanding the right to vote.

The 26th Amendment grants Congress the power to enforce the law and protect voters’ rights, just as the 15th Amendment (enfranchising black Americans,) the 19th (enfranchising women,) and the 24th (banning poll taxes) had previously.

This term, the Supreme Court will decide two voting rights cases that attempt to call into question Congress’s clear constitutional power to prevent discriminatory voting laws. Learn more about Shelby County v. Holder and Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council.

 

 Campaign buttons from 1968, the last presidential election in which 18 year olds could not participate.

 

More from Civil and Human Rights

Civil and Human Rights
July 18, 2026

Arnie Arnesen Attitude July 16 2026

Attitude with Arnie Arnesen
CAC’s David H. Gans joined The Attitude with Arnie Arnesen to discuss the Reconstruction Amendments. Listen...
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Wridt v. City of New York

In Wridt v. City of New York, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York is considering whether the NYPD’s mass surveillance system is unconstitutional.
Civil and Human Rights
July 8, 2026

Ruling Away From America’s Second Founding

Slate
CAC’s David H. Gans wrote about the Roberts Court for Slate magazine. Read more in Slate.
By: David H. Gans
Civil and Human Rights
July 1, 2026

Furthering Inclusive Constitutionalism

Jotwell
Professor Allison Brownell Tirres reviewed recent scholarship on the Black Conventions of Reconstruction by CAC’s David H....
Civil and Human Rights
June 30, 2026

CAC Release: Roberts Court’s Conservative Supermajority Hollows Out Equal Protection Guarantee

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Little v. Hecox and West Virginia...
By: David H. Gans, Praveen Fernandes, Joshua Blecher-Cohen
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. Supreme Court

Department of Labor v. Sun Valley Orchards, LLC

In Department of Labor v. Sun Valley Orchards, LLC, the Supreme Court is considering whether the Constitution permits the Department of Labor to use administrative proceedings to impose civil monetary penalties on employers who violate...