House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi Announces Brief Filed in House v. Burwell

Washington, D.C.Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi issued the following statement today on the amicus brief filed this afternoon with the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia in the case of U.S. House of Representatives v. Burwell. The amicus brief supports the government’s position that this inter-branch dispute should be resolved through traditional legislative processes, not by the courts; and also that the executive branch has been acting within its lawful authority when it reimburses health insurers for cost-sharing reductions – as the Affordable Care Act expressly requires it to do so. The brief is led by Leader Pelosi, joined by the House Democratic Leadership and by the Ranking Members of the House Appropriations, Education and the Workforce, Energy and Commerce, Judiciary, Rules, and Ways and Means Committees.

 

“After more than 60 dead-end votes to unravel the ACA, House Republicans are once again trying to get the courts to do their political work for them. This time, Republicans are suing to raise the health costs for millions of hard-working Americans – a preposterous attempt to destroy the law’s mandatory reimbursement of health insurers for the cost-sharing reductions that help low- and middle-income Americans buy health insurance.

 

“As leaders of Congress when the ACA was passed, the signers of this brief know that this Republican lawsuit is a meritless claim – one that shouldn’t even be entertained by the courts in the first place. For the courts to wade into such an inter-branch political dispute would displace the traditional legislative processes and destabilize the separation of powers among the three branches of government.

 

“However, if the District Court does reach the merits of this case, it should issue the only ruling consistent with the text and structure of the ACA: ruling that the ACA provided a permanent appropriation for these cost-sharing reductions. It is clear that the executive branch has been acting within its lawful authority in reimbursing health insurers for cost-sharing reductions, as the ACA expressly required it to do so. Republicans are brazenly trying to ignore the clear mandate for the cost-sharing reductions in the ACA, hurl insurance markets into chaos, and destroy the affordable health coverage of millions of Americans.

 

“Thanks to this historic law, nearly 18 million previously uninsured Americans now have quality, affordable health coverage. Republicans should stop wasting taxpayer dollars on lawsuits to dismantle the health coverage of hard working American families.”

More from

Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Jackler v. Merit Systems Protection Board

In Jackler v. Merit Systems Protection Board, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is considering whether the Trump administration can ignore critical civil service laws when removing Immigration Judges.
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Comey v. Department of Justice

In Comey v. Department of Justice, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York is considering whether the Attorney General can fire an Assistant U.S. Attorney in contravention of legal protections...
Civil and Human Rights
July 18, 2026

Arnie Arnesen Attitude July 16 2026

Attitude with Arnie Arnesen
CAC’s David H. Gans joined The Attitude with Arnie Arnesen to discuss the Reconstruction Amendments. Listen...
Access to Justice
----- Supreme Court -----

Crowther v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia

In Crowther v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia, the Supreme Court is considering whether employees of federally funded educational institutions can bring Title IX suits for sex discrimination.
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Wridt v. City of New York

In Wridt v. City of New York, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York is considering whether the NYPD’s mass surveillance system is unconstitutional.
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 16, 2026

CAC Release: Todd Blanche’s Record Disqualifies Him From Serving as America’s Lawyer

WASHINGTON, DC – In response to this week’s confirmation hearings on Todd Blanche’s nomination to...
By: Praveen Fernandes