Rule of Law

Reflections on My Fellowship

My fellowship experience at CAC has been deeply rewarding. Over the course of the fellowship, I’ve had the opportunity to research and draft amicus briefs on major cases before the Supreme Court and lower federal courts of appeals. The issues have ranged widely, from state sovereign immunity to arbitration, international human rights to environmental law, to immigration. But two things have remained constant throughout my time at CAC: the intellectual challenge of mastering an unfamiliar area of law with each new case, and the desire to help courts reach the correct outcome. That combination of intellectual fulfillment and purposeful litigation has made working at CAC a joy that I’ll cherish for years to come.

Throughout my time at CAC, I felt supported and inspired by a team of brilliant attorneys and staff. My supervisors provided consistently valuable feedback while retaining a level of collegiality that fostered frank debate about the merits and weaknesses of our arguments. They also encouraged me to work on cases in areas of personal interest, like federal jurisdiction and access to justice. And their dedication to CAC’s mission pervaded the office space, making it easy to dedicate long hours to drafting briefs. Likewise, CAC’s paralegals and office staff enabled me to produce work of the highest quality. The people played a large role in my rewarding experience.

As I reflect on the past year, I believe that CAC’s mission is more important than ever. Textual and historical methods have come to dominate judicial legal analysis today, particularly at the Supreme Court, but CAC remains the only nonprofit organization steadfastly demonstrating that such methodologies can lead to progressive outcomes too. CAC’s work gives the progressive cause a fair hearing before our nation’s courts across a wide range of statutory and constitutional issues. I feel proud of the work I’ve done as part of the organization and am excited to follow its achievements from afar.

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
September 18, 2026

Not Above the Law Constitution Day Call

CAC’s Praveen Fernandes joined Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, Representative Jamie Raskin, Public Citizen’s Lisa Gilbert, the...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Rule of Law
September 16, 2026

CAC Release: Plaintiffs File Opposition Brief Explaining Why Trump’s Efforts to Evade Accountability in Domestic Emoluments Clause Suit Should Be Rejected

WASHINGTON, DC – The Constitutional Accountability Center and Gelber Schachter & Greenberg jointly filed an...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, Gerald Greenberg
Rule of Law
September 10, 2026

September 2026 Newsletter: Protecting People’s Constitutional Rights and the Rule of Law Across the Country

This newsletter spends a lot of time on the U.S. Supreme Court, but here at CAC, we’re...
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

Perlmutter v. Blanche

In Perlmutter v. Blanche, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is considering whether the President can unilaterally remove the Register of Copyrights.
Rule of Law
August 18, 2026

Not Above the Law Creator Call

CAC's Praveen Fernandes and Senator Sheldon Whitehouse spoke about what accountability looks like now that...
By: Praveen Fernandes, Sheldon Whitehouse
Rule of Law
August 29, 2026

Interview with Praveen Fernandes, Vice President at the Constitutional Accountability Center

AbbyTheAttorney
CAC Vice President Praveen Fernandes spoke to Abby Winters about the weaponization of the Department...
By: Praveen Fernandes, Abby Winters