Today in the News, 2.12.09
- “[O]nce again, it looks like it’s a federal court that will force the state to deal with this festering problem.” Another local editorialist, this time in the Austin-American Statesman, complains about the lack of judicial neutrality that can result from campaign contributions made to candidates running for election as state court judges, following yesterday’s plea from the Chief Justice of the Texas Supreme Court to do away with partisan judicial elections. This issue is soon to be explored by the U.S. Supreme Court in Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal.
- “‘It’s not a subject that has a constituency,’ said Carrington. ‘Judges pretty much like things the way they are.’” Marcia Coyle of National Law Journal reports that a group of 33 law professors, judges, and attorneys are calling for fundamental changes in the way the U.S. Supreme Court functions.
- “’People would say, ‘Who cares that there’s this technical violation of the Constitution?’'” he says. Standing cases often ‘arise in the context of constitutional provisions that no longer seem so terribly significant.’” Jess Bravin, writing in the WSJ, explores the tricky issue of standing in certain types of cases involving the Constitution, following the recent debate over Hillary Clinton’s emoluments problem.
More from
January 6, 2026
CAC RELEASE: Five Years After the January 6th Attack, We Remember an Assault on Democracy
WASHINGTON, DC – Upon the fifth anniversary of the January 6th attack on the Capitol,...
January 2, 2026
Make 2026 the Year of Thomas Paine
As America celebrates its 250th birthday, remember the founder who rallied the people against British...
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Millennia Housing Management v. Department of Housing and Urban Development
In Millennia Housing Management v. Department of Housing and Urban Development, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit is considering a challenge to the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s authority to...
December 15, 2025
The Leadership Conference and 257 Other Groups Voice Strong Concerns About House Hearing on the Southern Poverty Law Center
December 15, 2025 The Honorable Chip Roy, Chairman The Honorable Mary Gay Scanlon, Ranking Member...
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Rise Economy v. Vought
In Rise Economy v. Vought, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California is considering whether the Trump Administration’s efforts to defund the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau are lawful.
December 11, 2025
Not Above the Law Coalition Demands Accountability: Trump’s Illegal National Guard Deployments Threaten Democracy
WASHINGTON - As the Senate Armed Services Committee holds a hearing on the Trump administration’s deployment...