Immigration and Citizenship

City of Evanston v. Barr

In Evanston v. Barr, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit is considering whether the United States Attorney General can impose funding conditions on local jurisdictions that receive certain federal funding in order to coerce those jurisdictions into adopting immigration policies preferred by President Trump.

Case Summary

The City of Evanston, like many localities across the nation, receives federal funding from the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (“Byrne JAG”) Program to help the City enhance public safety as it sees fit.  Byrne JAG amounts are calculated using a statutory formula keyed to the jurisdiction’s population and violent crime rate, and there are minimal limits on the public safety and criminal justice uses to which funds may be allocated.  Despite this, the United States Attorney General sought to mandate new funding conditions for every Byrne JAG recipient in an attempt to coerce cities into changing their immigration policies.  The City of Evanston and the U.S. Conference of Mayors sued in federal district court challenging the Attorney General’s authority to impose the new conditions.  The district court ruled for the plaintiffs, and the government appealed to the Seventh Circuit.

CAC filed an amici curiae brief on behalf of members of Congress, urging the Court to affirm the district court’s judgment.  In our brief, we explain that in establishing the Byrne JAG program, Congress neither imposed the challenged conditions on grant recipients, nor authorized the Attorney General to impose them.  Congress designed the program as a formula grant to ensure that states and localities would have maximum flexibility in determining how to best improve public safety in their respective jurisdictions.  The Attorney General’s coercive conditions are not only at odds with this flexibility, but also undermine public safety in cities like Evanston by decreasing trust and cooperation between the police force and crime victims and witnesses in many neighborhoods.  Moreover, as we explain, the statute on which the Attorney General principally relies does not concern either the Byrne JAG program or the Attorney General and thus provides no support for what he is attempting to do here.  Finally, we argue that the Attorney General’s attempt to administratively write into law new grant conditions runs afoul of fundamental constitutional principles.  The Framers recognized the dangers of concentrated power in the hands of a single government branch, and thus gave the authority to impose conditions on the receipt of federal financial assistance to Congress.  The Attorney General’s coercive actions cannot be squared with constitutional separation-of-powers principles or the Framers’ decision to give Congress the power of the purse.

Case Timeline

More from Immigration and Citizenship

Immigration and Citizenship
July 22, 2020

Hello, stranger: Trump belatedly recognizes coronavirus truths

'Will probably get worse' While President Donald Trump wasn't admitting how wrong he has been...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra, By William Goldschlag, By Dan Janison
Immigration and Citizenship
July 21, 2020

Trump targets those in US illegally from reapportionment

State House News Service
President Donald Trump on Tuesday directed the U.S. Secretary of Commerce to exclude undocumented immigrants...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra, By Colin A. Young
Immigration and Citizenship
July 21, 2020

Trump signs memo aimed at omitting undocumented immigrants from apportionment

Alabama Political Reporter
President Donald Trump on Tuesday signed a memorandum that would bar undocumented people from being...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra, By Eddie Burkhalter
Immigration and Citizenship
July 21, 2020

Trump tells census to not count undocumented people for purposes of deciding House apportionment

USA Today
WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump signed a memorandum Tuesday claiming that undocumented migrants should not be counted in...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra, By David Jackson
Immigration and Citizenship
July 21, 2020

Trump Moves to Exclude Unauthorized Immigrants From Counts for Congressional Seats

The Wall Street Journal
“The federal government has a constitutional obligation to count all people living in the United...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra, By Andrew Restuccia, By Paul Overberg
Immigration and Citizenship
July 21, 2020

RELEASE: Trump Census Memo “Blatantly Unconstitutional”

WASHINGTON – On news today of the Census memorandum issued by President Trump, Constitutional Accountability...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra, David H. Gans