Rule of Law

CAC Release: At the D.C. Circuit, Everyone Agrees that the Constitution Does Not Permit the President to Unilaterally Shutter the CFPB

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia this afternoon in National Treasury Employees Union v. Vought, a case in which the court is considering whether the Trump administration’s efforts to unilaterally shut down the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) are constitutional, Constitutional Accountability Center Equal Justice Works Fellow Anna Jessurun issued this reaction:

As the government conceded at oral argument today, the President cannot unilaterally shut down the CFPB without violating the Constitution. Citing CAC’s brief on behalf on current and former Members of Congress, counsel for the plaintiffs underscored that the power to create, restructure, and eliminate federal agencies is Congress’s power alone, and the President’s efforts to shutter the CFPB unlawfully intrude on Congress’s Article I powers and violate the Constitution’s bedrock principle of separation of powers. The D.C. Circuit should block the administration’s actions to shutter the agency and uphold Congress’s plenary power over the existence and structure of federal agencies.

CAC Chief Counsel Brianne Gorod added this reaction:

Congress created the CFPB in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis to protect America’s consumers and help ensure that another such crisis does not occur again. Its decision to do so is a quintessential example of Congress exercising its power over executive offices to provide for the welfare of the American people.

Since the CFPB was created, it has been remarkably successful at protecting America’s consumers. Indeed, without the CFPB, there would be no federal regulator charged with making sure that banks comply with the rules protecting consumers from deceptive practices. Shuttering the CFPB or reducing it in size to the point that it is incapable of fulfilling its statutory mandates would thus not only harm American consumers, but also would cause significant regulatory disruptions, undermining Congress’s plan in establishing the CFPB in the first place.

If President Trump wants to shut down the CFPB, the Constitution requires that he go to Congress and get it to give him the authority to do that. Notably, he has not done so.

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
May 7, 2026

Supreme Court yet to decide on Election Day, Trump firings

Roll Call
CAC Chief Counsel Brianne Gorod and her fellow panelists at CAC's 13th Annual Home Stretch at...
Rule of Law
May 7, 2026

CAC Release: Arraignment of SPLC Yet Another Step in Trump Administration March Against American Rights and Freedoms

WASHINGTON, DC – In response to today’s arraignment of the Southern Poverty Law Center, Constitutional...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Rule of Law
May 7, 2026

Bondi Corroded DOJ’s Integrity. Congress Must Now Demand Change

Bloomberg Law
CAC Vice President Praveen Frenandes and former DC Bar President Patrick McGlone co-authored an article...
By: Praveen Fernandes, Patrick McGlone
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. Office of Management and Budget

In Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. Office of Management and Budget, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is considering whether President Trump’s Office of Management and...
Rule of Law
April 25, 2026

The Chilling Message Behind Trump’s Attack On The SPLC

Huffington Post
CAC Vice President Praveen Fernandes was interviewed by HuffPost about Trump's attacks on the Southern...
Rule of Law
April 22, 2026

CAC Release: Targeting Civil Rights Groups Leaves All Americans Less Safe

WASHINGTON, DC – In response to yesterday’s indictment of the Southern Poverty Law Center, Constitutional...
By: Praveen Fernandes