Rule of Law

CAC Release: At the D.C. Circuit, Everyone Agrees that the Constitution Does Not Permit the President to Unilaterally Shutter the CFPB

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia this afternoon in National Treasury Employees Union v. Vought, a case in which the court is considering whether the Trump administration’s efforts to unilaterally shut down the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) are constitutional, Constitutional Accountability Center Equal Justice Works Fellow Anna Jessurun issued this reaction:

As the government conceded at oral argument today, the President cannot unilaterally shut down the CFPB without violating the Constitution. Citing CAC’s brief on behalf on current and former Members of Congress, counsel for the plaintiffs underscored that the power to create, restructure, and eliminate federal agencies is Congress’s power alone, and the President’s efforts to shutter the CFPB unlawfully intrude on Congress’s Article I powers and violate the Constitution’s bedrock principle of separation of powers. The D.C. Circuit should block the administration’s actions to shutter the agency and uphold Congress’s plenary power over the existence and structure of federal agencies.

CAC Chief Counsel Brianne Gorod added this reaction:

Congress created the CFPB in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis to protect America’s consumers and help ensure that another such crisis does not occur again. Its decision to do so is a quintessential example of Congress exercising its power over executive offices to provide for the welfare of the American people.

Since the CFPB was created, it has been remarkably successful at protecting America’s consumers. Indeed, without the CFPB, there would be no federal regulator charged with making sure that banks comply with the rules protecting consumers from deceptive practices. Shuttering the CFPB or reducing it in size to the point that it is incapable of fulfilling its statutory mandates would thus not only harm American consumers, but also would cause significant regulatory disruptions, undermining Congress’s plan in establishing the CFPB in the first place.

If President Trump wants to shut down the CFPB, the Constitution requires that he go to Congress and get it to give him the authority to do that. Notably, he has not done so.

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
September 10, 2026

September 2026 Newsletter: Protecting People’s Constitutional Rights and the Rule of Law Across the Country

This newsletter spends a lot of time on the U.S. Supreme Court, but here at CAC, we’re...
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

Perlmutter v. Blanche

In Perlmutter v. Blanche, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is considering whether the President can unilaterally remove the Register of Copyrights.
Rule of Law
August 18, 2026

Not Above the Law Creator Call

CAC's Praveen Fernandes and Senator Sheldon Whitehouse spoke about what accountability looks like now that...
By: Praveen Fernandes, Sheldon Whitehouse
Rule of Law
August 29, 2026

Interview with Praveen Fernandes, Vice President at the Constitutional Accountability Center

AbbyTheAttorney
CAC Vice President Praveen Fernandes spoke to Abby Winters about the weaponization of the Department...
By: Praveen Fernandes, Abby Winters
Rule of Law
September 1, 2026

Open Letter: A Network of 175+ Organizations Uniting to Defend the Rule of Law and Protect Vulnerable Communities

Nonprofits Together
CAC signed onto an open letter with a coalition of civil society, advocacy, and nonpartisan...
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

In re Trump

In In re Trump, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is considering whether a district court can investigate whether the Trump administration defied its orders when it sent Venezuelan...