Rule of Law

CAC Release: Attacking SPLC’s Work Leaves All Americans Less Safe

WASHINGTON, DC – In response to today’s House Judiciary Committee hearing targeting the Southern Poverty Law Center, Constitutional Accountability Center (CAC) Vice President Praveen Fernandes issued the following reaction:

Instead of investigating the Department of Justice’s involvement in a $1.8 billion slush fund Trump once proposed for his allies, or the Department’s refusal to release the Office of Legal Counsel’s opinion authorizing the military actions in Iran that have resulted in the deaths of brave American servicemembers and skyrocketing prices for American consumers, or the Department’s ongoing failure to provide the full Epstein file transparency that Congress and the American people have demanded, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan chose to hold a hearing aimed at amplifying falsehoods about the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) at the very moment the storied organization finds itself the subject of a politicized prosecution by the Trump Department of Justice.

This hearing should be understood not only as an attack on SPLC, but also as support for the Trump administration’s campaign to silence voices of dissent against Trump and his policies. For more than half a century, SPLC has monitored and documented violence and hate, playing a key role in a civil rights movement that has made our nation freer, fairer, and stronger. SPLC’s information, which it has shared with local and federal law enforcement under administrations of both political parties, has helped keep all Americans safe. When the work of organizations like SPLC is threatened, we should all be deeply concerned.

 

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
June 10, 2026

June Newsletter: CAC Helps Deliver Win for Everyday Americans with Another “Gorsuch Brief”

Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Jackler v. Department of Justice

In Jackler v. Department of Justice, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is considering whether the Trump administration can ignore critical civil service laws when removing Immigration Judges.
Rule of Law
June 5, 2026

The Senate Must Block Todd Blanche From Confirmation as Attorney General

Dear Senators, As organizations committed to the rule of law and the independence of federal...
Rule of Law
June 4, 2026

CAC Release: Unanimous Supreme Court Holds the SEC Need Not Prove Investor Losses to Obtain Disgorgement

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s unanimous decision at the Supreme Court in Sripetch v. Securities...
By: Simon Chin
Rule of Law
May 28, 2026

Congressional Democrats argue in filing that White House ballroom construction shouldn’t proceed without Congress’ consent

CBS News
CAC's brief on behalf of Members of Congress opposing construction on Trump's unconstitutional ballroom were...
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

National Trust for Historic Preservation v. National Park Service

In National Trust for Historic Preservation v. National Park Service, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit is considering whether President Trump can unilaterally demolish the White House’s East Wing and build a...