Rule of Law

RELEASE: Trump’s Shameful Pardons and Commutations Cannot Change the Facts of January 6th

WASHINGTON, DC – Upon reports that President Donald Trump has issued pardons and commutations for individuals convicted of offenses related to the January 6th attack on the Capitol, Constitutional Accountability Center Vice President Praveen Fernandes issued the following reaction:

Despite promises that he would advance “law and order,” one of President Trump’s first acts in office was to pardon, and to commute sentences for, individuals convicted of offenses related to the January 6, 2021, attack on the United States Capitol. These pardons and commutations do nothing to improve the lives of everyday Americans, but instead undermine accountability for those who participated in a violent attempt to overturn the results of the 2020 election. Trump’s actions today cannot erase the true facts of what happened on January 6th—facts developed through years of painstaking factfinding by nonpartisan and bipartisan governmental bodies, including the Select Committee to Investigate the January 6 Attack on the United States Capitol. The violence that day left countless law enforcement officers and workers injured, and it resulted in deaths; it was an assault on the will of the American voters and the rule of law. The American people will not forget.

##

Resources:

Praveen Fernandes & Donald K. Sherman, Justice delayed is political: Trump’s election interference case must continue ahead of the election, Salon.com (Sept. 8, 2024), https://www.salon.com/2024/09/08/justice-delayed-is-political-trumps-interference-case-must-continue-ahead-of-the/.

##
Constitutional Accountability Center is a nonpartisan think tank and public interest law firm dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text, history, and values. Visit CAC’s website at www.theusconstitution.org.

##

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Jackler v. Merit Systems Protection Board

In Jackler v. Merit Systems Protection Board, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is considering whether the Trump administration can ignore critical civil service laws when removing Immigration Judges.
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Comey v. Department of Justice

In Comey v. Department of Justice, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York is considering whether the Attorney General can fire an Assistant U.S. Attorney in contravention of legal protections...
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DHS Probationary Employees 1 Class v. Department of Homeland Security

In DHS Probationary Employees 1 Class v. Department of Homeland Security, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is considering whether the Trump Administration’s efforts to unilaterally reshape the federal government through...
Rule of Law
July 10, 2026

July Newsletter: The Legacy of the Declaration of Independence Belongs to We the People

Rule of Law
July 7, 2026

CAC Release: DOJ Under Todd Blanche Fails to Disclose Epstein Files (Again)

WASHINGTON, DC – In response to the Trump administration’s failure to disclose the Epstein files...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Rule of Law
July 4, 2026

Why Would President Trump Want to Celebrate the Declaration of Independence?

Common Dreams
CAC Vice President Praveen Fernandes wrote an op-ed for Common Dreams explaining the similarities between...
By: Praveen Fernandes