CAC Statement Following Individual Mandate Arguments At Supreme Court

Washington, DC – After oral arguments in the U.S. Supreme Court over the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate, Constitutional Accountability Center released the following reaction:

 

“By the end of today’s arguments,” CAC President Doug Kendall said, “the thinness of the challengers’ claim became apparent to anyone listening closely, and some of the Court’s conservatives seem to recognize that the challenge to the minimum coverage provision was more rhetoric than law.”

 

CAC Chief Counsel Elizabeth Wydra said, “Chief Justice Roberts repeatedly took on the claim that those without insurance are not in the health care market and, in his final question, Justice Kennedy seemed to recognize that it is Congress’s duty to find the best solution to the health care crisis, not the courts.”

 

Added CAC President Kendall, “Paul Clement conceded that states can impose a minimum coverage provision, but then argued the federal government cannot.  But the Constitution gives the federal government power to solve national problems.  And our clients — more than 500 state legislators from all 50 states — recognize that the states cannot solve the national health care crisis alone.”

 

##

 

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

 

###

More from

Voting Rights and Democracy
April 29, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court’s Conservative Supermajority, Once Again, Guts the Voting Rights Act and Further Enables Racial Discrimination in Voting

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Louisiana v. Callais, a...
By: David H. Gans
Access to Justice
April 28, 2026

CAC Release: In Cisco v. Doe Argument, Justices Grapple with the Scope of Liability Under Two Critical Human Rights Statutes

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Cisco Systems...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, Harith Khawaja
Access to Justice
April 27, 2026

Human Rights Suit Over Cisco Work for China Heads to Supreme Court

Bloomberg Law
CAC Senior Appellate Counsel Miriam Becker-Cohen was interviewed by Bloomberg Law about our brief in Cisco...
Criminal Law
April 27, 2026

CAC Release: Justices Push Back Against Government’s Claim of Unrestricted Access to Cell-Phone Location Information

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Chatrie v....
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Rule of Law
April 25, 2026

The Chilling Message Behind Trump’s Attack On The SPLC

Huffington Post
CAC Vice President Praveen Fernandes was interviewed by HuffPost about Trump's attacks on the Southern...
Access to Justice
April 17, 2026

The Most Offensive Thing a Supreme Court Justice Can Do Is Be Honest About the Supreme Court

Balls & Strikes
This Week In Other Stuff We Appreciated Judges Overseeing Louisiana’s Landmark Oil Cases Have Financial...