Civil and Human Rights
February 2023 Newsletter: Executive Action, Statutory Authority, and Conservative Charades at SCOTUS
More from Civil and Human Rights
February 27, 2025
What You Should Know About the Right to Protection in the Trump Era
The 14th Amendment was meant to enforce the laws equally, not put vulnerable populations in...
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington
Shilling v. Trump
In Shilling v. Trump, the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington is considering whether Trump’s Executive Order categorically barring transgender persons from serving in the military is unconstitutional.
February 19, 2025
History of the North Dakota Constitution Amicus Brief in Access Independent Health Services Inc., d/b/a Red River Women’s Clinic v. Wrigley
Amicus is the Constitutional Accountability Center, a think tank and public interest law firm dedicated...
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
Talbott v. Trump
In Talbott v. Trump, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is considering whether Trump’s Executive Order categorically barring transgender persons from serving in the military is unconstitutional.
March 18, 2025
Equality and Protection: The Forgotten Meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment
102 Denv. L. Rev. (forthcoming 2025)
North Dakota Supreme Court
Access Independent Health Services Inc. v. Wrigley
In Access Independent Health Services Inc. v. Wrigley, the North Dakota Supreme Court is considering whether North Dakota’s abortion ban violates the state constitution.