Civil and Human Rights

Gans on Black Conventions during Reconstruction

David Gans, Constitutional Accountability Center, has published Forgotten Framers: Black Conventions and the Second Founding, which is forthcoming in the Stanford Law Review:

This Article tells the forgotten story of the Black Conventions of the Reconstruction era, examining convenings of Black Americans across the nation during the time when the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments were under consideration. Invoking the promises of liberty and equality contained in the Declaration of Independence, these conventions insisted on Black Americans’ right to respect and dignity, fought for control of their bodies and their right to be full members of the body politic, including at the polls, and demanded an end to racial prejudice and violence that kept them in a subjugated status. Through their relentless activism, Black Americans repeatedly pressed white Americans to make the United States into a multiracial democracy that guaranteed fundamental rights, protection, and equal citizenship as an American birthright. In large measure, the Amendments that produced our Second Founding bore the imprint of this constitutional activism.

While critical to understanding the meaning of the Reconstruction Amendments, this history has never gotten its due. Dominant judicial and scholarly accounts of the text and history of the Reconstruction Amendments privilege elite white understandings, presenting history as if white voices were the only ones that mattered. As this Article demonstrates, this impoverishes our understanding of the Reconstruction Amendments and ignores how the Black Convention movement of the Reconstruction era shaped the transformational guarantees in those Amendments. Grappling with the work of the Black Conventions can help generate an inclusive constitutionalism, deepen our understanding of the text and history of the Reconstruction Amendments, provide resources to resolve current constitutional disputes, and help recover fundamental constitutional principles the Supreme Court has long betrayed.

More from Civil and Human Rights

Civil and Human Rights
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Williams v. Huner

In Williams v. Huner, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit is considering whether a Pennsylvania prison’s failure to provide a prisoner with rigid neck and wrist braces and effective pain medication violated...
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Womble v. Patel

In Womble v. Patel, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit is considering whether a North Carolina prison’s failure to provide a prisoner with a hearing-aid battery violated the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. Supreme Court

St. Mary Catholic Parish v. Roy

In St. Mary Catholic Parish v. Roy, the Supreme Court is considering whether the Free Exercise Clause requires Colorado to allow religious preschool providers to join its state-funded universal preschool program even though they refuse...
Civil and Human Rights
July 18, 2026

Arnie Arnesen Attitude July 16 2026

Attitude with Arnie Arnesen
CAC’s David H. Gans joined The Attitude with Arnie Arnesen to discuss the Reconstruction Amendments. Listen...
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Wridt v. City of New York

In Wridt v. City of New York, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York is considering whether the NYPD’s mass surveillance system is unconstitutional.
Civil and Human Rights
July 8, 2026

Ruling Away From America’s Second Founding

Slate
CAC’s David H. Gans wrote about the Roberts Court for Slate magazine. Read more in Slate.
By: David H. Gans