Voting Rights and Democracy

RELEASE: Justices Delay Resolution of Partisan Gerrymandering Cases

“These cases go to the very heart of our democracy and the issues they raise needed to be decided, not once again delayed.”

WASHINGTON—On news of the Supreme Court’s rulings in the related partisan gerrymandering cases of Gill v. Whitford and Benisek v. Lamone, Constitutional Accountability Center—which filed briefing on behalf of both Republican and Democratic current and former Members of Congress—issued the following reaction:

“This time, the justices should have left punting to the NFL,” said CAC President Elizabeth Wydra. “These cases go to the very heart of our democracy and the issues they raise needed to be decided, not once again delayed. That said, if there is any silver lining in today’s rulings, it is that the Court didn’t hold that partisan gerrymandering is constitutional. Instead, the fight will go on to ensure that the voters get to choose their representatives, and not the other way around. As Justice Kagan wrote, ‘partisan gerrymandering injures enough individuals and organizations in enough concrete ways to ensure that standing requirements, properly applied, will not often or long prevent courts from reaching the merits of cases like this one.’ For the sake of our democracy, when that day comes I hope the Court will, at long last, affirm that partisan gerrymandering cannot be squared with the text, history, and values of the Constitution.”

#

Resources:

CAC brief on behalf of current and former Republican and Democratic Members of Congress in Gill v. Whitford: https://www.theusconstitution.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Gill_v_Whitford_Merits_Amicus_Final.pdf

CAC brief on behalf of current and former Republican and Democratic Members of Congress in Benisek v. Lamone: https://www.theusconstitution.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Benisek-v.-Lamone-Amicus-FINAL.pdf

“Justice Kennedy, The First Amendment, and Partisan Gerrymandering,” Take Care, David H. Gans, October 4, 2017: https://www.theusconstitution.org/news/justice-kennedy-the-first-amendment-and-partisan-gerrymandering/

##

Now in our tenth year, Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history. Visit the new CAC website at www.theusconstitution.org.

###

More from Voting Rights and Democracy

Voting Rights and Democracy
September 10, 2024

Table Talk: Absentee ballots improve elections, reinforce democracy

The Post Athens
Absentee ballots rose to popularity during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic. Although absentee voting...
Voting Rights and Democracy
September 8, 2024

Moore v. Harper, Evasion, and the Ordinary Bounds of Judicial Review

66 Boston L. Rev. (forthcoming 2025)
By: David H. Gans, Brianne J. Gorod, Anna Jessurun
Voting Rights and Democracy
September 5, 2024

“Moore v. Harper, Evasion, and the Ordinary Bounds of Judicial Review”

Election Law Blog
David Gans, Brianne Gorod, and Anna Jessurun have posted this draft on SSRN (forthcoming, Boston College Law Review)....
By: Brianne J. Gorod, David H. Gans, Anna Jessurun, Rick Hasen
Voting Rights and Democracy
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

In re: Georgia Senate Bill 202

In In re: Georgia Senate Bill 202, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit is considering whether the Materiality Provision in the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits states from denying...
Voting Rights and Democracy
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Nairne v. Landry

In Nairne v. Landry, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is considering whether the Voting Rights Act’s prohibition on vote dilution is a constitutional exercise of Congress’s Fifteenth Amendment enforcement power.
Voting Rights and Democracy
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

United States v. Paxton

In United States v. Paxton, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is considering whether the Materiality Provision in the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits states from denying the right...