Voting Rights and Democracy

RELEASE: Justices Delay Resolution of Partisan Gerrymandering Cases

“These cases go to the very heart of our democracy and the issues they raise needed to be decided, not once again delayed.”

WASHINGTON—On news of the Supreme Court’s rulings in the related partisan gerrymandering cases of Gill v. Whitford and Benisek v. Lamone, Constitutional Accountability Center—which filed briefing on behalf of both Republican and Democratic current and former Members of Congress—issued the following reaction:

“This time, the justices should have left punting to the NFL,” said CAC President Elizabeth Wydra. “These cases go to the very heart of our democracy and the issues they raise needed to be decided, not once again delayed. That said, if there is any silver lining in today’s rulings, it is that the Court didn’t hold that partisan gerrymandering is constitutional. Instead, the fight will go on to ensure that the voters get to choose their representatives, and not the other way around. As Justice Kagan wrote, ‘partisan gerrymandering injures enough individuals and organizations in enough concrete ways to ensure that standing requirements, properly applied, will not often or long prevent courts from reaching the merits of cases like this one.’ For the sake of our democracy, when that day comes I hope the Court will, at long last, affirm that partisan gerrymandering cannot be squared with the text, history, and values of the Constitution.”

#

Resources:

CAC brief on behalf of current and former Republican and Democratic Members of Congress in Gill v. Whitford: https://www.theusconstitution.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Gill_v_Whitford_Merits_Amicus_Final.pdf

CAC brief on behalf of current and former Republican and Democratic Members of Congress in Benisek v. Lamone: https://www.theusconstitution.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Benisek-v.-Lamone-Amicus-FINAL.pdf

“Justice Kennedy, The First Amendment, and Partisan Gerrymandering,” Take Care, David H. Gans, October 4, 2017: https://www.theusconstitution.org/news/justice-kennedy-the-first-amendment-and-partisan-gerrymandering/

##

Now in our tenth year, Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history. Visit the new CAC website at www.theusconstitution.org.

###

More from Voting Rights and Democracy

Voting Rights and Democracy
May 15, 2026

Roberts Court UNDER FIRE after VOTING RIGHTS ACT Attack

Legal AF
CAC's David H. Gans joined the Legal AF podcast to discuss attacks on the Reconstruction...
Voting Rights and Democracy
April 29, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court’s Conservative Supermajority, Once Again, Guts the Voting Rights Act and Further Enables Racial Discrimination in Voting

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Louisiana v. Callais, a...
By: David H. Gans
Voting Rights and Democracy
April 15, 2026

David Gans on the History of the Reconstruction Amendments, and the Connection to Current Supreme Court Cases, including Callais

Election Law Blog
CAC Director of the Human Rights, Civil Rights, and Citizenship Program David Gans' article in Slate about...
Voting Rights and Democracy
March 23, 2026

The Alito Wing of the Supreme Court Sure Sounds Sold on Trump’s Voter Fraud Lies

Slate
CAC Director of the Human Rights, Civil Rights, and Citizenship Program David H. Gans' article...
Voting Rights and Democracy
March 23, 2026

The Supreme Court’s Conspiracy-Brained Justices Are Ready to Limit Mail-In Voting

Balls and Strikes
Balls & Strikes summarized the arguments in Watson v. RNC, linking to CAC's brief. Read more at...
Voting Rights and Democracy
March 21, 2026

Amicus with Dahlia Lithwick: The Roberts Court’s Internal Reckoning

Slate
The Constitutional Accountability Center's brief in Watson v. RNC was discussed on Slate's Amicus podcast. Listen to the full...