Voting Rights and Democracy

RELEASE: Justices Delay Resolution of Partisan Gerrymandering Cases

“These cases go to the very heart of our democracy and the issues they raise needed to be decided, not once again delayed.”

WASHINGTON—On news of the Supreme Court’s rulings in the related partisan gerrymandering cases of Gill v. Whitford and Benisek v. Lamone, Constitutional Accountability Center—which filed briefing on behalf of both Republican and Democratic current and former Members of Congress—issued the following reaction:

“This time, the justices should have left punting to the NFL,” said CAC President Elizabeth Wydra. “These cases go to the very heart of our democracy and the issues they raise needed to be decided, not once again delayed. That said, if there is any silver lining in today’s rulings, it is that the Court didn’t hold that partisan gerrymandering is constitutional. Instead, the fight will go on to ensure that the voters get to choose their representatives, and not the other way around. As Justice Kagan wrote, ‘partisan gerrymandering injures enough individuals and organizations in enough concrete ways to ensure that standing requirements, properly applied, will not often or long prevent courts from reaching the merits of cases like this one.’ For the sake of our democracy, when that day comes I hope the Court will, at long last, affirm that partisan gerrymandering cannot be squared with the text, history, and values of the Constitution.”

#

Resources:

CAC brief on behalf of current and former Republican and Democratic Members of Congress in Gill v. Whitford: https://www.theusconstitution.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Gill_v_Whitford_Merits_Amicus_Final.pdf

CAC brief on behalf of current and former Republican and Democratic Members of Congress in Benisek v. Lamone: https://www.theusconstitution.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Benisek-v.-Lamone-Amicus-FINAL.pdf

“Justice Kennedy, The First Amendment, and Partisan Gerrymandering,” Take Care, David H. Gans, October 4, 2017: https://www.theusconstitution.org/news/justice-kennedy-the-first-amendment-and-partisan-gerrymandering/

##

Now in our tenth year, Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history. Visit the new CAC website at www.theusconstitution.org.

###

More from Voting Rights and Democracy

Voting Rights and Democracy
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity, Inc. v. Secretary, State of Georgia

In Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity, Inc. v. Secretary, State of Georgia and two consolidated cases, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit is considering whether the Voting Rights Act’s prohibition on vote...
Voting Rights and Democracy
March 26, 2024

The Airtight Case Against Texas’ Mail-In Voting Age Requirements

Slate
In Texas and a number of other states, voters age 65 and older have the...
By: David H. Gans
Voting Rights and Democracy
Florida Supreme Court

Black Voters Matter Capacity Building Institute v. Byrd

In Black Voters Matter Capacity Building Institute v. Byrd, the Florida Supreme Court is considering whether a congressional map diminishes the voting power of Black Floridians in violation of the Florida Constitution.
Voting Rights and Democracy
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Petteway v. Galveston County

In Petteway v. Galveston County, the Fifth Circuit is determining whether a group of Black and Latino voters can challenge the dilution of their voting power under the Voting Rights Act.
Voting Rights and Democracy
U.S. Supreme Court

Cascino v. Nelson

In Cascino v. Nelson, the Supreme Court is being asked to consider whether a Texas law that only allows voters over age 65 to vote by mail violates the Twenty Sixth Amendment’s prohibition on age-based...
Voting Rights and Democracy
----- District Courts -----

Byrd v. Black Voters Matter Capacity Building Institute

In Byrd v. Black Voters Matter Capacity Building Institute, the Florida District Court of Appeals is considering whether a congressional map diminishes the voting power of Black Floridians in violation of the Florida Constitution.