Voting Rights and Democracy

RELEASE: Justices Delay Resolution of Partisan Gerrymandering Cases

“These cases go to the very heart of our democracy and the issues they raise needed to be decided, not once again delayed.”

WASHINGTON—On news of the Supreme Court’s rulings in the related partisan gerrymandering cases of Gill v. Whitford and Benisek v. Lamone, Constitutional Accountability Center—which filed briefing on behalf of both Republican and Democratic current and former Members of Congress—issued the following reaction:

“This time, the justices should have left punting to the NFL,” said CAC President Elizabeth Wydra. “These cases go to the very heart of our democracy and the issues they raise needed to be decided, not once again delayed. That said, if there is any silver lining in today’s rulings, it is that the Court didn’t hold that partisan gerrymandering is constitutional. Instead, the fight will go on to ensure that the voters get to choose their representatives, and not the other way around. As Justice Kagan wrote, ‘partisan gerrymandering injures enough individuals and organizations in enough concrete ways to ensure that standing requirements, properly applied, will not often or long prevent courts from reaching the merits of cases like this one.’ For the sake of our democracy, when that day comes I hope the Court will, at long last, affirm that partisan gerrymandering cannot be squared with the text, history, and values of the Constitution.”

#

Resources:

CAC brief on behalf of current and former Republican and Democratic Members of Congress in Gill v. Whitford: https://www.theusconstitution.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Gill_v_Whitford_Merits_Amicus_Final.pdf

CAC brief on behalf of current and former Republican and Democratic Members of Congress in Benisek v. Lamone: https://www.theusconstitution.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Benisek-v.-Lamone-Amicus-FINAL.pdf

“Justice Kennedy, The First Amendment, and Partisan Gerrymandering,” Take Care, David H. Gans, October 4, 2017: https://www.theusconstitution.org/news/justice-kennedy-the-first-amendment-and-partisan-gerrymandering/

##

Now in our tenth year, Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history. Visit the new CAC website at www.theusconstitution.org.

###

More from Voting Rights and Democracy

Voting Rights and Democracy
U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

California v. Trump

In California v. Trump, the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit is considering whether President Trump’s executive order on voting is unlawful.
Voting Rights and Democracy
January 9, 2026

Supreme Court Gets New Warning in Pending Case

Newsweek
The Democratic National Committee has filed an amicus brief in the Supreme Court’s upcoming election law...
Voting Rights and Democracy
U.S. Supreme Court

Watson v. Republican National Committee

In Watson v. Republican National Committee, the Supreme Court is considering whether Mississippi may count absentee ballots that are postmarked by Election Day but received up to 5 business days later.
Voting Rights and Democracy
December 9, 2025

CAC Release: Major Campaign Finance Case Tests Court’s Willingness to Respect Congress’s Policy Judgments Aimed at Curbing Harmful Corruption

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in National Republican...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, David H. Gans
Voting Rights and Democracy
October 15, 2025

The Supreme Court Is Poised to Rule That It’s Racist to Remedy Racism

Slate
Is it racist to remedy racism? That’s the question at the heart of Callais v. Louisiana,...
Voting Rights and Democracy
October 15, 2025

Supreme Court seems skeptical of key provisions in Voting Rights Act

Medill News Service
WASHINGTON, Oct. 15 (UPI) -- The Supreme Court expressed skepticism Wednesday of a key provision of the Voting...