King: Victory For The Affordable Care Act

SUPREME COURT PLAZA, Washington, DC – On news this morning that the U.S. Supreme Court handed down a 6-3 ruling in King v. Burwell, upholding a key function of the Affordable Care Act, Constitutional Accountability Center issued the following reaction:

 

CAC President Doug Kendall said, “Today, Chief Justice John Roberts chose to uphold the rule of law and the ACA against an openly partisan attack. It is a great day for millions of Americans already relying on the ACA for affordable insurance; for the Court as an institution; and for the Chief Justice’s stature as he completes his tenth Term on the Court.”

 

CAC Senior Counsel Simon Lazarus added, “The Court recognized that it must consider the full text, context, structure, and purpose of the ACA, and that these sources all pointed to these subsidies being available on HealthCare.gov.”

 

#

 

Resources:

 

In King, CAC represented Senate Democratic Leader Reid, House Democratic Leader Pelosi, key former committee chairs in Congress, and more than 100 state legislators in office when the Affordable Care Act was passed: http://theusconstitution.org/cases/king-v-burwell

 

CAC experts on King include Chief Counsel Elizabeth Wydra and Appellate Counsel Brianne Gorod.

 

CAC’s project evaluating the first ten Terms of Chief Justice John Roberts, “Roberts at 10” http://theusconstitution.org/robertsat10

 

##

 

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

 

###

 

More from

Access to Justice
----- Supreme Court -----

Crowther v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia

In Crowther v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia, the Supreme Court is considering whether employees of federally funded educational institutions can bring Title IX suits for sex discrimination.
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Wridt v. City of New York

In Wridt v. City of New York, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York is considering whether the NYPD’s mass surveillance system is unconstitutional.
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 16, 2026

CAC Release: Todd Blanche’s Record Disqualifies Him From Serving as America’s Lawyer

WASHINGTON, DC – In response to this week’s confirmation hearings on Todd Blanche’s nomination to...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DHS Probationary Employees 1 Class v. Department of Homeland Security

In DHS Probationary Employees 1 Class v. Department of Homeland Security, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is considering whether the Trump Administration’s efforts to unilaterally reshape the federal government through...
Rule of Law
July 10, 2026

July Newsletter: The Legacy of the Declaration of Independence Belongs to We the People

Federal Courts and Nominations
July 9, 2026

Leadership Conference Sign-on Letter Opposing Confirmation of Todd Blanche

Reject the Confirmation of Todd Blanche as U.S. Attorney General    The Honorable Chuck Grassley,...