Rule of Law
RELEASE: Supreme Court Will Review Denial of Trump’s Request for Absolute Presidential Immunity, Further Delaying Criminal Proceedings Against Him
WASHINGTON, DC – Following the Supreme Court’s decision regarding Donald Trump’s request to stay the criminal proceedings against him pending further review of the D.C. Circuit’s decision that Trump is not immune from criminal prosecution for crimes committed while in office, Constitutional Accountability Center (CAC) Appellate Counsel Smita Ghosh issued the following reaction:
Last month, the D.C. Circuit unanimously rejected former President Trump’s claim of absolute immunity from criminal prosecution. The Supreme Court has now decided to hear his appeal of that decision in April, which will keep the criminal proceedings against him on hold for at least several months.Today’s decision, which comes over two weeks after Trump’s request, makes clear that the Court does not take seriously the need for prompt resolution of this dispute. In previous cases involving time-sensitive political issues—including Bush v. Gore—the Court demonstrated that it can act quickly when circumstances demand it. It should be doing the same here.Significantly, though, the Court’s decision has no bearing on how the Court will resolve Trump’s claim on the merits, as the Court’s order made clear. Given the clear case against Trump’s unprecedented claim for absolute immunity, which has already been denied by two courts, the Supreme Court should rule against Trump—and it should do so as quickly as possible.
##
Resources:
Case page in Trump v. United States: https://www.theusconstitution.org/litigation/trump-v-united-states/
Smita Ghosh, The Founding Fathers Didn’t Think Donald Trump Should Get Immunity Either, Newsweek: https://www.theusconstitution.org/news/the-founding-fathers-didnt-think-donald-trump-should-get-immunity-either-opinion/
##
Constitutional Accountability Center is a nonpartisan think tank and public interest law firm dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text, history, and values. Visit CAC’s website at www.theusconstitution.org.
##
More from Rule of Law
U.S. Supreme Court
February 25, 2026
Sripetch v. Securities and Exchange Commission
In Sripetch v. Securities and Exchange Commission, the Supreme Court is considering whether a showing of pecuniary harm to investors is a prerequisite to an award of disgorgement in a civil action brought by the...
April 30, 2026
13th Annual Home Stretch at the Supreme Court
CAC Release: Supreme Court Oral Argument Focuses on Takings Clause, While Largely Ignoring the Problematic Excessive-Fines-Clause Analysis Applied by the Court Below
WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Pung v....
February 24, 2026
50+ Organizations Condemn Federal Authorities for Blocking Minnesota’s Independent Investigation into CBP Killing of Alex Pretti
WASHINGTON, DC — Today marks one month since the killing of Alex Pretti on January...
February 20, 2026
CAC Release: Supreme Court Rejects President Trump’s Claim of Unilateral Tariff Authority
WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Learning Resources v. Trump and Trump...
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Climate United Fund v. Citibank
In Climate United Fund v. Citibank, the en banc United States of Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit is considering whether the Trump administration can unilaterally abolish a mandatory grant program created by Congress.