Rule of Law

RELEASE: Trump Arraignment: A Moment Both Exceptional and Not

WASHINGTON, DC – Upon former President Donald J. Trump pleading not guilty to 34 criminal counts, including felony charges relating to falsifying business records and conspiracy involving Trump’s alleged role in hush money payments made to two women during the 2016 presidential campaign, CAC released the following reaction.

CAC President Elizabeth Wydra stated:

The arraignment of a former president garners attention because of the high profile of the defendant, but what occurred today is unexceptional for those who know how the rule of law is supposed to function in this nation.  A judge read charges authorized by an indictment of a grand jury and brought by a prosecutor—and a defendant acknowledged that he understood the charges and pleaded not guilty.  Now this case will move through the trial process, during which both the prosecution and the defense will be afforded the opportunity to present evidence and their strongest arguments before a group of randomly selected citizens who will serve as trial jurors.  These jurors will be tasked with the duty to fairly and impartially follow the facts and the law where they lead.  And the jurors will be entrusted to honor a central tenet of the rule of law in this nation:  no one—not even a former president—is above the law.

##

Constitutional Accountability Center is a nonpartisan think tank and public interest law firm dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text, history, and values. Visit CAC’s website at www.theusconstitution.org.

###

Praveen Fernandes, Possible Trump Indictment Shows the Rule of Law at Work: https://www.theusconstitution.org/news/possible-trump-indictment-shows-the-rule-of-law-at-work/ 

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
February 25, 2026

Supreme Court not fully sold on foreclosure fairness bid

Courthouse News Service
A showdown over tax foreclosures had the justices considering the striking set of facts that...
Rule of Law
February 25, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Oral Argument Focuses on Takings Clause, While Largely Ignoring the Problematic Excessive-Fines-Clause Analysis Applied by the Court Below

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Pung v....
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Rule of Law
February 24, 2026

50+ Organizations Condemn Federal Authorities for Blocking Minnesota’s Independent Investigation into CBP Killing of Alex Pretti

WASHINGTON, DC — Today marks one month since the killing of Alex Pretti on January...
Rule of Law
February 20, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Rejects President Trump’s Claim of Unilateral Tariff Authority

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Learning Resources v. Trump and Trump...
By: Simon Chin
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

Climate United Fund v. Citibank

In Climate United Fund v. Citibank, the en banc United States of Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit is considering whether the Trump administration can unilaterally abolish a mandatory grant program created by Congress.
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Oregon v. Landis

In Oregon v. Landis, the Ninth Circuit is considering when states may prosecute federal officers for state crimes.