Rule of Law

Trump Fires Head of U.S. Labor Watchdog Agency

The firing of National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) chair Gwynne Wilcox has effectively crippled the watchdog agency, with labor groups warning of widespread impacts for unions across the U.S.

Wilcox was appointed NLRB chair by President Joe Biden in December, for a term that was set to expire in 2028. Shortly after taking office, President Donald Trump tagged NLRB board member Marvin Caplan to fill the role instead, before announcing that he had fired Wilcox and NLRB general counsel Jennifer Abruzzo on January 27. With Wilcox removed from the board, the NLRB now lacks the three-member quorum required to issue decisions, leaving it unable to act on any outstanding investigations into workplace violations, union petitions or unfair labor practices.

In a statement to The GuardianWilcox said that she plans to pursue “all legal avenues” to challenge her removal. Under the National Labor Relations Act, the president is only allowed to fire NLRB members for “neglect of duty or malfeasance in office.” A 1935 Supreme Court ruling also limits the president’s authority to removal federal employees who perform legislative or judicial duties, which includes NLRB members.

“President Trump’s firing of an NLRB Member without good cause flies in the face of that precedent and practice and is blatantly unconstitutional,” said Brian Frazelle, deputy chief counsel for the Constitutional Accountability Center, a progressive think tank based out of Washington, D.C.

AFL-CIO president Liz Shuler echoed that sentiment in a January 28 release, claiming that Wilcox’s firing was illegal, and warning of “immediate consequences for working people.”

“These moves will make it easier for bosses to violate the law and trample on workers’ legal rights on the job and fundamental freedom to organize,” she added.

A range of other labor groups have criticized Wilcox’s removal as well, including the National Education Association and Communications Workers of America.

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Jackler v. Merit Systems Protection Board

In Jackler v. Merit Systems Protection Board, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is considering whether the Trump administration can ignore critical civil service laws when removing Immigration Judges.
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Comey v. Department of Justice

In Comey v. Department of Justice, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York is considering whether the Attorney General can fire an Assistant U.S. Attorney in contravention of legal protections...
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DHS Probationary Employees 1 Class v. Department of Homeland Security

In DHS Probationary Employees 1 Class v. Department of Homeland Security, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is considering whether the Trump Administration’s efforts to unilaterally reshape the federal government through...
Rule of Law
July 10, 2026

July Newsletter: The Legacy of the Declaration of Independence Belongs to We the People

Rule of Law
July 7, 2026

CAC Release: DOJ Under Todd Blanche Fails to Disclose Epstein Files (Again)

WASHINGTON, DC – In response to the Trump administration’s failure to disclose the Epstein files...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Rule of Law
July 4, 2026

Why Would President Trump Want to Celebrate the Declaration of Independence?

Common Dreams
CAC Vice President Praveen Fernandes wrote an op-ed for Common Dreams explaining the similarities between...
By: Praveen Fernandes