Constitutional Accountability Center Files its First Brief in the Supreme Court Case of Wyeth v. Levine

Constitutional Accountability Center today filed its first brief in the Supreme Court case of Wyeth v. Levine, as amicus curiae in support of the respondent, Diana Levine. Ms. Levine, a professional musician, sued the pharmaceutical company Wyeth in Vermont court based on injuries she suffered—including amputation of her right arm— after she was injected with an anti-nausea drug manufactured by Wyeth. The Vermont courts sided with Ms. Levine, but Wyeth and its supporters have challenged this ruling in the U.S. Supreme Court.

Wyeth v. Levine presents the question of whether state-law claims against drug manufacturers for failing to properly warn consumers about dangerous risks associated with their products should be displaced by federal law and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulation. CAC has filed its amicus curiae brief in support of allowing state common law claims to work in conjunction with FDA oversight, because neither the Constitution nor the principles behind it support such a broad intrusion into the States’ ability to protect their citizens, particularly where Congress has not expressed its intent to preempt state law.

 

CAC assists State and local officials in upholding valid and democratically enacted measures and historic common law remedies. Over the last decade, CAC’s predecessor organization, Community Rights Counsel, filed amicus briefs in preemption cases before the Supreme Court in support of many State and local laws.

 

Download the brief (PDF)

More from

Rule of Law
December 8, 2025

CAC Release: Conservative Justices Neglect History at Oral Argument in Monumental Case about Independent Agencies

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Trump v....
By: Brian R. Frazelle, Michelle Berger
Rule of Law
U.S. Supreme Court

Pung v. Isabella County

In Pung v. Isabella County, the Supreme Court is considering whether the Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amendment is implicated when a local government seizes real property to satisfy a tax debt and then...
Civil and Human Rights
December 5, 2025

Supreme Court Lets Stand a Two-Tiered System of Justice That Deprives Military Families of the Same Rights Afforded to Civilians

The Rutherford Institute
WASHINGTON, DC — In a ruling that leaves thousands of military servicemembers and their families...
Rule of Law
December 8, 2025

Raises Serious Legal Questions: Wydra on Boat Strike

Bloomberg
Constitutional Accountability Center President Elizabeth Wydra weighs in on the second strike by the United...
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California

Al Otro Lado v. Trump

In Al Otro Lado v. Trump, the United States District Court for the Southern District of California is considering whether the Trump Administration can prohibit certain people from seeking asylum at ports of entry.
Immigration and Citizenship
November 20, 2025

Trump’s fight to redefine ‘American citizen’ returns to Supreme Court

Courthouse News Service
After winning round one, President Trump wants the justices to tee up a final showdown...