Statement by Doug Kendall, President and Founder, Constitutional Accountability Center Hailing the Decision of the Supreme Court to Review McDonald v. City of Chicago

September 30, 2009

WASHINGTON, DC — “Today’s decision by the Supreme Court to hear McDonald v. City of Chicago is about more than guns: it is about whether the Court will restore the precise constitutional text that requires states to honor the fundamental rights of all Americans.  At issue is not only whether the Second Amendment right to bear arms is incorporated against state action through the Fourteenth Amendment, but how

The correct answer to this question should be important to all Americans, not just those focused on gun rights.  The parties and Constitutional Accountability Center have asked the Court to revisit an 1873 opinion that effectively wrote the 14th Amendment’s Privileges or Immunities Clause out of the Constitution.  Restoring this explicit protection for substantive liberty would not only secure appropriate Second Amendment rights against infringement by state and local government action, but would also provide a more secure textual foundation for ensuring other fundamental rights.    It is an outcome all Americans should urge and welcome.”

###

Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history. CAC filed a brief in support of Supreme Court review in McDonald v. City of Chicago on behalf of a diverse group of preeminent constitutional scholars including Jack Balkin of Yale Law School and Randy Barnett of Georgetown University Law Center.

Contact: Debra Greenspan, dgreenspan@gpgdc.com, 202-741-5573

 

More from

Immigration and Citizenship
June 25, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Misunderstands Immigration Law—and the Presumption of Extraterritoriality—in Decision about Asylum-Seekers at the Border

WASHINGTON, DC – Following the Supreme Court’s decision this morning in Noem v. Al Otro...
By: Smita Ghosh
Access to Justice
June 23, 2026

CAC Release: In Deeply Disappointing Decision, Supreme Court Ignores Ordinary Meaning of Statute and Denies Victims of Torture Their Day in Court

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Cisco Systems v. Doe,...
By: Harith Khawaja
Rule of Law
June 23, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Decision on Excessive Fines Clause Reaches the Wrong Result, But Gets the Standard Right

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Pung v. Isabella County,...
By: Brianne J. Gorod
Access to Justice
June 23, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court’s Conservative Supermajority Undermines Important Right Created by Congress

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Landor v. Louisiana Department...
By: Brianne J. Gorod
Rule of Law
June 22, 2026

The Supreme Court Is About to Decide Four Cases Defining Trump’s Power

The Wall Street Journal
CAC President Elizabeth Wydra spoke to the Wall Street Journal about the major decisions left...
Rule of Law
June 21, 2026

Trump DOJ in CRISIS MODE

Legal AF
CAC Vice President Praveen Fernandes joined the Legal AF podcast to discuss Todd Blanche's nomination...