Civil and Human Rights

RELEASE: JUSTICE Act Fails to Ensure Accountability

WASHINGTON – On introduction of the JUSTICE Act this morning, CAC President Elizabeth Wydra issued the following statement:

Earlier today, Senator Tim Scott and Senate Republican leadership introduced the JUSTICE Act, their purported response to the national and global outcry for true equality and systemic change in the wake of the killings of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, and countless other African American men and women over generations at the hands of police. 

The path towards justice, however, begins with accountability, and this bill is entirely lacking on that score. The JUSTICE Act does not end qualified immunity, does not criminalize the reckless use of excessive force, and does not expand the authority to conduct pattern or practice investigations—all of which are necessary first steps to hold law enforcement accountable when they violate federally and constitutionally protected rights. 

The Constitutional Accountability Center continues to call on Congress to pass H.R. 7085, the Ending Qualified Immunity Act—introduced recently by Representatives Justin Amash (L-MI) and Ayanna Pressley (D-MA), and co-sponsored by members of both parties—which would ensure government accountability, encourage courts to play their historic role of redressing abuse of power, and create an incentive for governments to properly train, staff, and equip their departments.

#

Resources:

“CAC Endorses the Ending Qualified Immunity Act,” Statement of CAC President Elizabeth Wydra, June 5, 2020: https://www.theusconstitution.org/news/release-cac-endorses-the-ending-qualified-immunity-act/ 

##

Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history. Visit CAC’s website at www.theusconstitution.org.

###

More from Civil and Human Rights

Civil and Human Rights
December 5, 2025

Supreme Court Lets Stand a Two-Tiered System of Justice That Deprives Military Families of the Same Rights Afforded to Civilians

The Rutherford Institute
WASHINGTON, DC — In a ruling that leaves thousands of military servicemembers and their families...
Civil and Human Rights
November 20, 2025

Supreme Court Could Redefine the Limits of State Power

Newsweek
As the Supreme Court considers Chiles v. Salazar, a case examining Colorado’s 2019 ban on gay conversion therapy...
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. Supreme Court

Little v. Hecox and West Virginia v. B.P.J.

In Little v. Hecox and West Virginia v. B.P.J., the Supreme Court is considering whether laws in Idaho and West Virginia that prohibit all transgender women and girls from joining women’s and girls’ sports teams—across...
Civil and Human Rights
November 9, 2025

Supreme Court to hear case on religious rights in prison

Deseret News
Oral arguments on Monday in Landor v. Louisiana will focus on religious liberties while incarcerated.
Civil and Human Rights
November 10, 2025

CAC Release: In Landor Case, Question of Whether Person in Prison Who Suffered Undisputed Religious Liberty Violation Has Any Meaningful Remedy Hangs in the Balance

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Landor v....
Civil and Human Rights
October 7, 2025

Supreme Court Appears Poised to Strike Down Ban on Anti-LGBTQ ‘Conversion Therapy’

The New Civil Rights Movement
The U.S. Supreme Court appears poised to strike down a Colorado ban on so-called conversion...