Corporate Accountability

RELEASE: Supreme Court Upholds Important Tool For Courts to Enforce Securities Laws

WASHINGTON – On news that the U.S. Supreme Circuit issued its decision in Liu v. SEC, holding that “a disgorgement award that does not exceed a wrongdoer’s net profits and is awarded for victims is” permissible equitable relief, CAC President Elizabeth Wydra issued the following statement:

Today’s ruling that federal courts may impose disgorgement awards in cases involving violations of the nation’s securities laws, requiring ill-gotten gains to be distributed from perpetrators to victims, is an important victory. 

As we argued on behalf of Members of Congress, the courts of appeals have unanimously held for over fifty years that disgorgement falls within the general equity powers that Congress gave district courts when they hear cases involving violations of the nation’s securities laws. In fact, Congress has premised key provisions of law in this area on the existence of disgorgement authority. The Supreme Court was right not to disturb Congress’s legislative plan that disgorgement be available to help enforce the nation’s securities laws.

#

Resources:

CAC brief on behalf of Members of Congress in Liu v. SEC: https://www.theusconstitution.org/litigation/liu-v-sec/ 

##

Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history. Visit CAC’s website at www.theusconstitution.org.

###

More from Corporate Accountability

Corporate Accountability
U.S. Supreme Court

Federal Communications Commission v. AT&T and Verizon v. Federal Communications Commission

In Federal Communications Commission v. AT&T and Verizon v. Federal Communications Commission, the Supreme Court is considering whether the FCC’s two-stage civil-enforcement process violates the Seventh Amendment.
Corporate Accountability
January 15, 2026

January Newsletter: CAC Keeps Up the Fight for Corporate Accountability

Corporate Accountability
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Millennia Housing Management v. Department of Housing and Urban Development

In Millennia Housing Management v. Department of Housing and Urban Development, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit is considering a challenge to the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s authority to...
Corporate Accountability
July 2, 2025

Moneyed Interests Still Prevail at the Supreme Court (2024-2025 Term)

The Court Continues to Favor Corporations over Workers, Consumers, and the Environment.
By: Brian R. Frazelle, Ana Builes
Corporate Accountability
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Novartis v. Secretary United States Department of Health and Human Services

In Novartis v. Secretary United States Department of Health and Human Services, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit considered whether the Inflation Reduction Act’s Medicare drug price negotiation program is an unconstitutional...
Corporate Accountability
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Boehringer Ingelheim v. Department of Health and Human Services

In Boehringer Ingelheim v. Department of Health and Human Services, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit considered whether the Inflation Reduction Act’s Medicare drug price negotiation program is an unconstitutional taking...