Federal Courts and Nominations

Comment to Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States

In Brief

Any modern examination of the role of the courts in our system of government—particularly the Supreme Court—must first take into account the voices of those people in America who have routinely and systematically experienced discrimination and oppression throughout our history.
No one can deny that the question of whether to expand the number of seats on the Supreme Court is an especially important one—and deservedly so. Issues of Supreme Court legitimacy and expansion, however, should not end the Commission’s discussion.
Two areas concern the issues of Supreme Court ethics and the "shadow docket." This Commission should examine ways to bring clarity and transparency to the ethical standards governing Supreme Court justices, and investigate ways the Court's shadow docket can be brought into the light

There is no question that the issue of Supreme Court expansion is critically important to America’s future, but there is more to improving the third branch of government than that issue. Not only must this Commission take strides to center people in America still excluded from the protections of federal courts that our Constitution promises to them, but the Commission also must not forget issues of ethics and the administration of justice that, while essential to everyday Americans, all too often go overlooked.

More from Federal Courts and Nominations

Federal Courts and Nominations
January 17, 2024

The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights Sign-On Letter Prioritizing Diverse Judges

Dear Senator, On behalf of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights and the...
Federal Courts and Nominations
January 23, 2023

BLOG: How Do We Fix an Ailing Court? Lessons From Reconstruction

The Supreme Court is ailing, but you wouldn’t know it from Chief Justice Roberts’s 2022...
By: David H. Gans
Federal Courts and Nominations
November 30, 2022

RELEASE: How Do We Fix an Ailing Court? Reconstruction Provides Critical Lessons

WASHINGTON – Today, Constitutional Accountability Center is releasing new scholarship by CAC Civil Rights Director...
By: David H. Gans
Federal Courts and Nominations
November 29, 2022

ISSUE BRIEF: Court Reform and the Promise of Justice: Lessons from Reconstruction

Lewis and Clark Law Review, Vol. 27, No. 3, 2023 The Supreme Court is broken....
By: David H. Gans
Federal Courts and Nominations
August 15, 2022

BLOG: Building the Next Generation of Constitutional Progressives

This summer, CAC welcomed four interns to learn our method of understanding the progressive promise...
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 14, 2022

Supreme Court Review: The Future of Supreme Court

Host: NYCLA’s Civil Rights and Liberties Committee and NYCLA’s Supreme Court Reform Committee
Program Chair: Elliot Dolby Shields, Co-chair NYCLA’s Civil Rights Committee; Chair, NYCLA’s Supreme Court Reform...
Participants: David H. Gans, Elliot Dolby Shields, Amir Ali, Alicia Bannon, Katherine M. Franke, Rachel Rebouche