Rule of Law

CAC Release: Attempts to Intimidate Public Officials Doing Their Jobs Should Concern All Americans

WASHINGTON, DC –  Upon press reports of the Trump Department of Justice’s decision to charge Congresswoman LaMonica McIver with “assaulting, impeding, and interfering with law enforcement” during an oversight visit to an immigration detention center in her home state of New Jersey, Praveen Fernandes, Vice President of the Constitutional Accountability Center, issued the following statement:

Our Constitution provides Congress with the power to conduct oversight, and Members of Congress have the power and duty to conduct oversight over key issues that affect the American public, including their constituents. While the facts are still emerging, it is difficult to understand this charge against Congresswoman McIver—particularly when seen as part of a pattern of charging or threatening to charge perceived political opponents of President Trump—as anything but another page taken from the authoritarian playbook.

We should all be worried if publicly elected officials are being intimidated simply for taking their oaths of office seriously and doing the jobs they were elected to do. The danger of executive power wielded without strong checks and balances concerned the Framers of the Constitution when our national charter was adopted, and that danger should concern all of us today. If the Trump administration is able to do this to a sitting member of Congress performing an official duty, what protects everyday Americans?

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
February 25, 2026

Supreme Court not fully sold on foreclosure fairness bid

Courthouse News Service
A showdown over tax foreclosures had the justices considering the striking set of facts that...
Rule of Law
February 25, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Oral Argument Focuses on Takings Clause, While Largely Ignoring the Problematic Excessive-Fines-Clause Analysis Applied by the Court Below

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Pung v....
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Rule of Law
February 24, 2026

50+ Organizations Condemn Federal Authorities for Blocking Minnesota’s Independent Investigation into CBP Killing of Alex Pretti

WASHINGTON, DC — Today marks one month since the killing of Alex Pretti on January...
Rule of Law
February 20, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Rejects President Trump’s Claim of Unilateral Tariff Authority

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Learning Resources v. Trump and Trump...
By: Simon Chin
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

Climate United Fund v. Citibank

In Climate United Fund v. Citibank, the en banc United States of Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit is considering whether the Trump administration can unilaterally abolish a mandatory grant program created by Congress.
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Oregon v. Landis

In Oregon v. Landis, the Ninth Circuit is considering when states may prosecute federal officers for state crimes.