Voting Rights and Democracy

CAC Release: The Continuing Assault on the Voting Rights Act Is Back at the Supreme Court

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Louisiana v. Callais on whether to reverse a district court decision that held unconstitutional the map the Louisiana legislature enacted to remedy a prior violation of the Voting Rights Act, Constitutional Accountability Center Director of the Human Rights, Civil Rights, and Citizenship Program David H. Gans issued the following reaction:

The Voting Rights Act is the nation’s most important civil rights law that helps safeguard the multiracial democracy our Constitution guarantees. In this morning’s argument, the Court’s conservative wing seemed poised to gut the Voting Rights Act’s nationwide prohibition on discriminatory results, repeatedly suggesting that any use of race to remedy a state’s racially discriminatory maps is unconstitutional and that there has to be a time limit on voting rights remedies. This idea that the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments—added to the Constitution to ensure that Black Americans would be full members of the body politic—bars legal remedies for racial vote dilution designed to cancel out Black voting strength turns the Constitution on its head.

The text and history of the Fifteenth Amendment give Congress broad powers to eradicate all forms of racial discrimination in voting, authorizing enforcement measures, such as the Voting Rights Act, to ensure that voters in communities of color have the equal right to elect representatives of their choice. The Framers of the Fifteenth Amendment understood that race mattered, and that made it critical to give Congress broad powers to squelch efforts to suppress or cancel out the votes of Black Americans. In this morning’s oral argument, the Court’s conservative Justices turned a blind eye to this core part of the Fifteenth Amendment’s text and history.

The Voting Rights Act was passed to vindicate the Fifteenth Amendment’s promise of a participatory democracy open to all regardless of race. The Court should honor the text and history of the Fifteenth Amendment and reject the attack on the Voting Rights Act in Callais.

More from Voting Rights and Democracy

Voting Rights and Democracy
U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

California v. Trump

In California v. Trump, the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit is considering whether President Trump’s executive order on voting is unlawful.
Voting Rights and Democracy
January 9, 2026

Supreme Court Gets New Warning in Pending Case

Newsweek
The Democratic National Committee has filed an amicus brief in the Supreme Court’s upcoming election law...
Voting Rights and Democracy
U.S. Supreme Court

Watson v. Republican National Committee

In Watson v. Republican National Committee, the Supreme Court is considering whether Mississippi may count absentee ballots that are postmarked by Election Day but received up to 5 business days later.
Voting Rights and Democracy
December 9, 2025

CAC Release: Major Campaign Finance Case Tests Court’s Willingness to Respect Congress’s Policy Judgments Aimed at Curbing Harmful Corruption

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in National Republican...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, David H. Gans
Voting Rights and Democracy
October 15, 2025

The Supreme Court Is Poised to Rule That It’s Racist to Remedy Racism

Slate
Is it racist to remedy racism? That’s the question at the heart of Callais v. Louisiana,...
Voting Rights and Democracy
October 15, 2025

Supreme Court seems skeptical of key provisions in Voting Rights Act

Medill News Service
WASHINGTON, Oct. 15 (UPI) -- The Supreme Court expressed skepticism Wednesday of a key provision of the Voting...