Rule of Law

The Constitution in a Modern Context

Constitutionalism is a great idea, but it’s not a new one to Charles Krauthammer [“Constitutionalism,” op-ed, Jan. 7] or House Republicans. Rather, it is the genius of framers such as James Madison and Alexander Hamilton, and “We the People,” who established a constitutional republic more than 220 years ago.

Mr. Krauthammer’s attempt to claim the Constitution as his own is an offensive, if standard, trope of conservatives. But the difference between constitutional progressives and constitutional conservatives is not about whether to follow the Constitution, but about what the Constitution requires and allows, particularly when it comes to the powers of the federal government.

In that regard, the best moment of the reading of the Constitution on the House floor last week came when Tea Party firebrand Rep. Allen B. West (R-Fla.) was forced to read the Constitution’s “necessary and proper” clause, known by the framers as the “sweeping clause” for the powers it granted to the national government. Hopefully, after reading the document out loud, Mr. West and his fellow conservatives should have a better idea of what constitutionalism is all about.

Doug Kendall, Washington

The writer is president of the Constitutional Accountability Center.

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
April 30, 2026

13th Annual Home Stretch at the Supreme Court

Host: Constitutional Accountability Center
This year’s Home Stretch at the Supreme Court panel discussion will be moderated by Law...
Participants: Elizabeth B. Wydra, Brianne J. Gorod, Easha Anand, Jennifer Bennett, Kelsi Brown Corkran, Chris Geidner, Melissa Murray
Rule of Law
February 25, 2026

Supreme Court not fully sold on foreclosure fairness bid

Courthouse News Service
A showdown over tax foreclosures had the justices considering the striking set of facts that...
Rule of Law
February 25, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Oral Argument Focuses on Takings Clause, While Largely Ignoring the Problematic Excessive-Fines-Clause Analysis Applied by the Court Below

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Pung v....
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Rule of Law
February 24, 2026

50+ Organizations Condemn Federal Authorities for Blocking Minnesota’s Independent Investigation into CBP Killing of Alex Pretti

WASHINGTON, DC — Today marks one month since the killing of Alex Pretti on January...
Rule of Law
February 20, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Rejects President Trump’s Claim of Unilateral Tariff Authority

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Learning Resources v. Trump and Trump...
By: Simon Chin
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

Climate United Fund v. Citibank

In Climate United Fund v. Citibank, the en banc United States of Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit is considering whether the Trump administration can unilaterally abolish a mandatory grant program created by Congress.