Federal Courts and Nominations

Letters: It’s Not Packing, Just Filling the D.C. Bench

Your editorial “Packing the D.C. Circuit” (May 20) accuses President Obama of preparing to “pack” the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit with three judges it “doesn’t need.” “Packing” is an odd description of the president’s constitutional duty to nominate people to fill vacant seats on the federal bench. Congress has authorized this important federal appellate court to have a total of 11 judges, and it currently has only seven.

 

The editorial’s claim that the D.C. Circuit doesn’t need more judges because it has a comparatively low caseload ignores the reality that the court hears some of the most complex and time-consuming cases in the federal court system, a point made powerfully by Chief Justice John Roberts, a former D.C. Circuit judge.

 

Including Mr. Roberts, President George W. Bush put four judges on the D.C. Circuit. With the May 23 confirmation of Sri Srinivasan, the Obama total is one. Senate Republicans had no “workload” issues when they voted to confirm President Bush’s nominees to this court, at a time when the number of cases per authorized judge was less than it is now.

 

The claim by some Senate Republicans, and the Journal, that one is enough, is nothing more than a wholesale filibuster of President Obama’s future nominees.

 

Judith E. Schaeffer

Constitutional Accountability Center

Washington

More from Federal Courts and Nominations

Federal Courts and Nominations
January 17, 2024

The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights Sign-On Letter Prioritizing Diverse Judges

Dear Senator, On behalf of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights and the...
Federal Courts and Nominations
January 23, 2023

BLOG: How Do We Fix an Ailing Court? Lessons From Reconstruction

The Supreme Court is ailing, but you wouldn’t know it from Chief Justice Roberts’s 2022...
By: David H. Gans
Federal Courts and Nominations
November 30, 2022

RELEASE: How Do We Fix an Ailing Court? Reconstruction Provides Critical Lessons

WASHINGTON – Today, Constitutional Accountability Center is releasing new scholarship by CAC Civil Rights Director...
By: David H. Gans
Federal Courts and Nominations
November 29, 2022

ISSUE BRIEF: Court Reform and the Promise of Justice: Lessons from Reconstruction

Lewis and Clark Law Review, Vol. 27, No. 3, 2023 The Supreme Court is broken....
By: David H. Gans
Federal Courts and Nominations
August 15, 2022

BLOG: Building the Next Generation of Constitutional Progressives

This summer, CAC welcomed four interns to learn our method of understanding the progressive promise...
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 14, 2022

Supreme Court Review: The Future of Supreme Court

Host: NYCLA’s Civil Rights and Liberties Committee and NYCLA’s Supreme Court Reform Committee
Program Chair: Elliot Dolby Shields, Co-chair NYCLA’s Civil Rights Committee; Chair, NYCLA’s Supreme Court Reform...
Participants: David H. Gans, Elliot Dolby Shields, Amir Ali, Alicia Bannon, Katherine M. Franke, Rachel Rebouche