Rule of Law

Friends of Court Draw Battle Lines Ahead of Health Care Arguments

By Marcia Coyle

 

Like armies mustering their best weapons, supporters and opponents of the Affordable Care Act once again have turned out at the U.S. Supreme Court to battle over a critical element of that health insurance law.

 

Fifty-two amicus briefs—21 supporting the challengers and 31 backing the Obama administration—are on record in King v. Halbig, which the justices will hear on March 4. The political, economic and social stakes are huge. If the challengers prevail, the law itself, enacted in 2010, could collapse.

 

 

On the challengers’ side, conservative-libertarian legal and political organizations dominate. Also supporting that side are six states, a number of legal scholars and 15 Republican members of Congress. On the other side are national health, insurance, hospital, education and labor organizations; Nobel economists; 22 states; nearly 100 state legislators; and U.S. House and Senate Democratic leaders.

 

 

House-Senate Democratic leaders and 100 state legislators

 

These include Democratic leaders involved in drafting the ACA and state lawmakers who debated whether to establish state exchanges. They point to evidence in the legislative record; reports by the Congressional Budget Office; and statements by the Joint Committee on Taxation, U.S. Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) and other members of Congress indicating that they all understood that subsidies would be available on state or federal exchanges. Elizabeth Wydra of the Constitutional Accountability Center is counsel of record.

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
February 25, 2026

Supreme Court not fully sold on foreclosure fairness bid

Courthouse News Service
A showdown over tax foreclosures had the justices considering the striking set of facts that...
Rule of Law
February 25, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Oral Argument Focuses on Takings Clause, While Largely Ignoring the Problematic Excessive-Fines-Clause Analysis Applied by the Court Below

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Pung v....
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Rule of Law
February 24, 2026

50+ Organizations Condemn Federal Authorities for Blocking Minnesota’s Independent Investigation into CBP Killing of Alex Pretti

WASHINGTON, DC — Today marks one month since the killing of Alex Pretti on January...
Rule of Law
February 20, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Rejects President Trump’s Claim of Unilateral Tariff Authority

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Learning Resources v. Trump and Trump...
By: Simon Chin
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

Climate United Fund v. Citibank

In Climate United Fund v. Citibank, the en banc United States of Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit is considering whether the Trump administration can unilaterally abolish a mandatory grant program created by Congress.
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Oregon v. Landis

In Oregon v. Landis, the Ninth Circuit is considering when states may prosecute federal officers for state crimes.