Criminal Law

Where Are We with Location Privacy? Reactions to the Supreme Court’s Oral Argument in Carpenter v. United States

The privacy of cell phone location information and free speech will be the focus of the American Bar Association program, Where Are We with Location Privacy? Reactions to the Supreme Court’s Oral Argument in Carpenter v. United States, Nov. 30 at the ABA’s Washington, D.C., office.

Details

Thursday, November 30, 2017
4:00 pm
American Bar Association
John Marshall Conference Room—5th floor
1050 Connecticut Ave., NW
Washington, D.C., 20036
American Bar Association

Event description authored by host organization. Information here does not necessarily reflect the views of CAC and may not be up to date — please refer to RSVP link for the latest information.


The privacy of cell phone location information and free speech will be the focus of the American Bar Association program, Where Are We with Location Privacy? Reactions to the Supreme Court’s Oral Argument in Carpenter v. United States, Nov. 30 at the ABA’s Washington, D.C., office.

Discussion questions include:

  • What is the degree of Fourth Amendment protection given to the location data generated by cell phones?
  • How will the Court view cell phone privacy as it relates to recent digital privacy cases?
  • Will the Court take up the call by Justice Sonia Sotomayor and others to reconsider the application of Smith v. Maryland and the Fourth Amendment rules concerning records held by third parties?

Speakers include Alan Jay Butler, senior counsel, Electronic Privacy Information Center; Dan Schweitzer, Supreme Court counsel, National Association of Attorneys General; Elizabeth Wydra, president, Constitutional Accountability Center; and Jake Laperruque, senior counsel, The Constitution Project.

The event is sponsored by the Section of Civil Rights and Social Justice, Privacy and Information Protection Committee. Co-sponsored by the Electronic Privacy Information Center, The Constitution Project, the ABA Section of Intellectual Property Law, the ABA Section of Science & Technology Law, the ABA Cybersecurity Legal Task Force, and the ABA Criminal Justice Section.

This event is open to members of the media. For press credentialing, please contact Betsy Adeboyejo at Betsy.Adeboyejo@americanbar.org.

To register for the live webinar, click here.

To register for the event, click here.

More from Criminal Law

Criminal Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Hayat v. Diaz

In Hayat v. Diaz, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit is considering whether police officers may forcibly enter homes without a warrant based only on “reasonable suspicion” of a crime.
Criminal Law
U.S. Supreme Court

Anibowei v. Blanche

In Anibowei v. Blanche, the Supreme Court is being asked to consider whether the Fourth Amendment permits law enforcement officers—without a warrant, probable cause, or even reasonable suspicion of illegal activity—to search the contents of...
Criminal Law
U.S. Supreme Court

Kian v. State of Florida

In Kian v. State of Florida, the Supreme Court is considering whether the Sixth Amendment requires a jury to have at least twelve members.
Criminal Law
June 29, 2026

CAC Release: In Important Victory for Digital Privacy, Supreme Court Holds that Even Short-Term Police Monitoring of Cell-Phone Location Information Is Regulated by the Fourth Amendment

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Chatrie v. United States,...
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Criminal Law
May 28, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Recognizes Clear Pathway to Habeas Relief in Mississippi Jury Race-Discrimination Case

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Pitchford v. Cain, a...
Criminal Law
May 28, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Majority Rules that Judges Cannot Consider Changing Views of Crime when Reducing Sentences

WASHINGTON, DC – Following the Supreme Court’s decision this morning in Rutherford v. United States...