Criminal Law

CAC Release: Supreme Court Recognizes Clear Pathway to Habeas Relief in Mississippi Jury Race-Discrimination Case

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Pitchford v. Cain, a case in which the Court considered whether, under federal habeas law, the Mississippi Supreme Court unreasonably held that a criminal defendant waived his right to challenge racial bias in his jury selection, Constitutional Accountability Center Appellate Counsel Joshua Blecher-Cohen issued the following reaction:

Today’s decision holds that the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) offers a pathway to habeas relief for Terry Pitchford. As explained in the amici curiae brief the Constitutional Accountability Center filed along with the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Congress, when passing AEDPA, preserved an important role for federal courts to review state-court convictions, including Pitchford’s, for certain errors. The Supreme Court’s decision affirms that role, recognizing that, although the AEDPA standard of review is solicitous of state decisions, “deference does not mean abdication” of review by federal courts.

More from Criminal Law

Criminal Law
July 9, 2026

CAC Release: In Important Victory for Digital Privacy, Supreme Court Holds that Even Short-Term Police Monitoring of Cell-Phone Location Information Is Regulated by the Fourth Amendment

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Chatrie v. United States,...
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Criminal Law
May 28, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Majority Rules that Judges Cannot Consider Changing Views of Crime when Reducing Sentences

WASHINGTON, DC – Following the Supreme Court’s decision this morning in Rutherford v. United States...
Criminal Law
May 28, 2026

CAC Release: Court’s Commitment to Text and History Falters in Compassionate Release Case

WASHINGTON, DC – Following the Supreme Court’s decision in Fernandez v. United States, a case...
Criminal Law
April 27, 2026

CAC Release: Justices Push Back Against Government’s Claim of Unrestricted Access to Cell-Phone Location Information

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Chatrie v....
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Criminal Law
March 31, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Considers Availability of Habeas Relief in Mississippi Jury Race-Discrimination Case

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Pitchford v....
By: Joshua Blecher-Cohen
Criminal Law
U.S. Supreme Court

Chatrie v. United States

In Chatrie v. United States, the Supreme Court is considering whether “geofence warrants” violate the Fourth Amendment.