Civil and Human Rights

McDonald v. Chicago: The Case and the 2nd Amendment

Details

Monday, April 5, 2010
4:00 pm
American Constitution Society

On March 2, 2010, the Supreme Court heard arguments for McDonald v. City of Chicago, on the issue of whether—and, if so, how—the Constitution protects against state infringement of the individual right to keep and bear arms recognized by the Court last year in District of Columbia v. Heller. While the case has largely been billed as a Second Amendment case, it could have broad implications for individual rights, including strengthening the foundation of cases like Roe v. Wade and Lawrence v. Texas.

The panel will feature guests Joshua Horwitz, Executive Director of the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence, Elizabeth Wydra, Chief Counsel of Constitutional Accountability Center, and Alan Gura, of Gura Possessky, who is the lead attorney for McDonald and argued the case before the Supreme Court. The panel will be moderated by Maryland Law Professor Richard Boldt.

More from Civil and Human Rights

Civil and Human Rights
December 5, 2025

Supreme Court Lets Stand a Two-Tiered System of Justice That Deprives Military Families of the Same Rights Afforded to Civilians

The Rutherford Institute
WASHINGTON, DC — In a ruling that leaves thousands of military servicemembers and their families...
Civil and Human Rights
November 20, 2025

Supreme Court Could Redefine the Limits of State Power

Newsweek
As the Supreme Court considers Chiles v. Salazar, a case examining Colorado’s 2019 ban on gay conversion therapy...
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. Supreme Court

Little v. Hecox and West Virginia v. B.P.J.

In Little v. Hecox and West Virginia v. B.P.J., the Supreme Court is considering whether laws in Idaho and West Virginia that prohibit all transgender women and girls from joining women’s and girls’ sports teams—across...
Civil and Human Rights
November 9, 2025

Supreme Court to hear case on religious rights in prison

Deseret News
Oral arguments on Monday in Landor v. Louisiana will focus on religious liberties while incarcerated.
Civil and Human Rights
November 10, 2025

CAC Release: In Landor Case, Question of Whether Person in Prison Who Suffered Undisputed Religious Liberty Violation Has Any Meaningful Remedy Hangs in the Balance

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Landor v....
Civil and Human Rights
October 7, 2025

Supreme Court Appears Poised to Strike Down Ban on Anti-LGBTQ ‘Conversion Therapy’

The New Civil Rights Movement
The U.S. Supreme Court appears poised to strike down a Colorado ban on so-called conversion...