Federal Courts and Nominations

Why Courts Matter: What the 2012 Election Means for 2013 and Beyond

Details

Thursday, November 8, 2012
12:00 pm
Center for American Progress and Constitutional Accountability Center

In the face of a more ideologically-divided Supreme Court than the nation has seen in generations, and with more judicial vacancies today than in early 2009, the outcome of the 2012 election will have significant ramifications on the composition of our nation’s courts – and therefore on the lives of millions of Americans. We know from recent cases that no matter the issue – health care, immigration, voting rights, affirmative action – the courts play a significant and lasting role in American life.

Two days after Election 2012, please join the Center for American Progress for a discussion of what the election means for the future of our courts, for analysis of the politics and process surrounding judicial nominations going forward, and for a conversation about the future of the Supreme Court and the issues in the law likely to affect the American public in the years to come.

This event is co-sponsored by the American Constitution Society for Law and Policy and the Constitutional Accountability Center.

Welcoming Remarks:

  • John D. Podesta, Chair, Center for American Progress, former White House Chief of Staff

Panelists:

  • Caroline Fredrickson, President, American Constitution Society for Law and Policy
  • Doug Kendall, Founder and President, Constitutional Accountability Center
  • Ian Millhiser, Senior Policy Analyst for Constitutional Policy at the Center for American Progress and Justice Editor, CAP Action’s ThinkProgress

Moderator:

  • Andrew Blotky, Director, Legal Progress, Center for American Progress

More from Federal Courts and Nominations

Federal Courts and Nominations
January 17, 2024

The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights Sign-On Letter Prioritizing Diverse Judges

Dear Senator, On behalf of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights and the...
Federal Courts and Nominations
January 23, 2023

BLOG: How Do We Fix an Ailing Court? Lessons From Reconstruction

The Supreme Court is ailing, but you wouldn’t know it from Chief Justice Roberts’s 2022...
By: David H. Gans
Federal Courts and Nominations
November 30, 2022

RELEASE: How Do We Fix an Ailing Court? Reconstruction Provides Critical Lessons

WASHINGTON – Today, Constitutional Accountability Center is releasing new scholarship by CAC Civil Rights Director...
By: David H. Gans
Federal Courts and Nominations
November 29, 2022

ISSUE BRIEF: Court Reform and the Promise of Justice: Lessons from Reconstruction

Lewis and Clark Law Review, Vol. 27, No. 3, 2023 The Supreme Court is broken....
By: David H. Gans
Federal Courts and Nominations
August 15, 2022

BLOG: Building the Next Generation of Constitutional Progressives

This summer, CAC welcomed four interns to learn our method of understanding the progressive promise...
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 14, 2022

Supreme Court Review: The Future of Supreme Court

Host: NYCLA’s Civil Rights and Liberties Committee and NYCLA’s Supreme Court Reform Committee
Program Chair: Elliot Dolby Shields, Co-chair NYCLA’s Civil Rights Committee; Chair, NYCLA’s Supreme Court Reform...
Participants: David H. Gans, Elliot Dolby Shields, Amir Ali, Alicia Bannon, Katherine M. Franke, Rachel Rebouche